Jump to content

Talk:Charles Crawford (diplomat)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unsourced material

[edit]

This whole article is unsourced apart from a 2005 article behind a paywall. I have not been able to find any more recent information from good sources. I have removed potentially contentious parts. It's debatable how notable the material is anyway.

Notable?

[edit]

This is clearly a vanity page. It's linked to from his own website... Middling diplomats? Seriously? Pistachiones (talk) 13:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the first point of WP:ANYBIO re the CMG. I would not call an ambassador a "middling" diplomat, especially not the British ambassador to Bosnia, Serbia and then Poland. That is a senior diplomat. Vanity page or not (and I would dispute it is) he is clearly notable enough for an article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't classify this as a "vanity page", but it does read like a CV, and clearly needs some work. Here's a pointer to some less flattering aspects, from a fellow ex-ambassador.
--NSH001 (talk) 11:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Crawford (diplomat). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Crawford (diplomat). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Listen to his reflections...

[edit]

I think that paragraph should be turned into an external link, not embedded in the article. --Haruo (talk) 05:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]