Talk:Charge trap flash

Seems biased

I came to this article looking for pros and cons of this charge trap flash vs the floating conductor gate flash. In all places, only advantages are mentioned. If that's in fact the case then why isn't it 100% of the market? This leads me to believe there is some bias in the writing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:1008:1201:F09E:C84D:9AF6:6E99 (talk) 21:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Text removed

I have removed a large amount of text from the page, which, per my suspicion on IRC, was infact copyvio from this site. I have listed it as a reference, and it is hopefully possible to write the article using only GFDL text Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article is incorrect.

Charge trap flash was not invented in 2006 by Samsung.

A company called Saifun patented numerous elements of charge trap flash before 2006. This technology is best commercialized by a company called Spansion, which was spun out of AMD. Spansion makes NOR flash memory but it's flavor of NOR uses MirrorBit technology (which uses charge trapping licensed from Saifun) instead of floating gate. (It does also make some floating gate, which was how it started off initially).

Spansion announced that it will buy Saifun in Oct. 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.239.52.20 (talk) 19:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article continues the obfuscation that "charge trapping" is somehow not a subset of the floating gate concept and technology. Whether using a conducting or insulating material (the only good insulator here is the silica, which contrary to this article, is not crystalline), this is old stuff, "invented" many decades ago (not in the new millenium). Also, getting patents in nonvolatile memory does not indicate one invented any of the relevant fundamental approaches. Wikibearwithme (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is this just SONOS

Is there any reason this can't be folded into the SONOS article? IE, is this not simply a trade name for Samsung's particular implementation of SONOS? Maury 15:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charge trap flash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charge trap flash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120806165251/http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/HONSHI/20090827/174636/ to http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/HONSHI/20090827/174636/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]