This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project. Tag more articles with our standard project template. Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
"Box Office Mojo" and "The numbers" report conflicting information. I have noticed that Box Office Mojo is updated daily and it looks more reliable when it homes to international box office. I have also noticed that the Wikipedia page for other movies (i.e. Civil War) lean on the Box Office Mojo data. Vincenzo.politi (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In this case, The Numbers is correct. It seems like Box Offixe Mojo has accidentally put the $93M worldwide total into the international section instead of the accurate $43M. If you count up all of the box office reports of the single international markets on Box Office Mojo, you'll notice it counts up to the accurate $43M, and not $93M. As a general rule, in case there are conflicting reports, The Numbers tends to be more accurate than Box Office Mojo ever since Amazon took over Box Office Mojo. 2A02:A457:CA18:1:290A:2087:520F:2D27 (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is using Google reviews to say the film had a negative audience reception really accurate? I've never seen Google reviews cited as a reliable source for audience reviews and the film seems to have positive audience reception elsewhere such as Metacritic and RT. I know those sites aren't used because of how easily user scores can be manipulated, but so too can Google reviews. Plus, the Deadline source in the reception doesn't actually mention Google reviews. 172.89.132.192 (talk) 13:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]