Talk:Certificate of occupancy
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Picture of Document
[edit]Would this image (click here for the image) be considered fair use? (Source of image: [1]) Noone 22:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
New York Specific
[edit]Why is there a NY specific section on regulations? Seems like it should be taken out. --Messeis1 (talk) 20:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
My opinion exactly. I see nothing in the section which appears to be significantly different from the norm. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 14:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Certificate of Occupancy → Certificate of occupancy –
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support this is the generic name of a type of documents. The names of specific certificates might be capitalized. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support per nom. It's clear from the article that the subject is a generic concept, therefore downcasing is appropriate. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 07:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.