A fact from Cecelia Hall (mezzo-soprano) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that American mezzo-soprano Cecelia Hall portrayed the lead male role in Mozart's Ascanio in Alba?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article was created or improved during the Going Back in Time GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in June 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green articles
This article relies too heavily on artist bios on the websites of orchestra and opera companies. These bios are typically written by the artist themselves, or by their personal paid PR agent and talent management group. They are entirely not independent and should not be used to verify content on wikipedia per policy at WP:VERIFIABILITY. Additionally, it's not clear to me that Seen and Heard International is a reputable website with appropriate editorial controls. I'm sure this production had reviews in more traditional media like local newspapers which would be far preferable over the use of this website. Lastly, it would be preferable not to use the Juilliard Journal if possible, as school newspapers covering students/alumni is not ideal under sourcing guidelines. I don't think there is a serious notability problem here because there is likely to be coverage of this artist in reviews in better publications. Please put the work in and find better sources for this same content.4meter4 (talk) 02:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The information (not bio) from opera houses is only used to support that she performed these roles at these houses at certain times. There is nothing promotional in that information. Also, German opera houses are non-profit cultural organizations, like museums. Would you discredit information from a museum about a piece of art is displays. I will look for more reviews in addition, but not today, - RL. I am not sure about finding something better than the Juillard journal because that was rather long ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. Museums are cultural institutions that curate and preserve art and other artifacts deemed of cultural or historical significance, and which do research on those artworks or artifacts. They are in essence more akin to a library or university than an opera house, theatre, or art gallery. They do not typically commission new works of art and are not involved in the making of art typically. Further, not all museums have great editorial controls in publications. In general, we would consider museum publications WP:SELFPUBLISHED (unless done with an independent academic publisher) that could be used under certain circumstances (depending on the author, and editorial practices of the institution.) The rare museums that make original art and write on that art would be considered WP:PRIMARY SOURCES on those works, and those sources that should be used sparingly per WP:Verifiability.
2. Opera houses and theaters, even government supported ones, are essentially institutions in the business of making theatrical productions. These are living art forms and the people making them lack independence from the work they are doing. In other words, all theatre, orchestra, opera company websites are WP:PRIMARY SOURCES. They should therefore not be used whenever possible per WP:No Original Research. That's not to say they can't be used at all, but caution is needed.
3. I think the Juillard Journal is not ideal, because it is an institution writing on itself and those connected to it. It's an independence issue. A better source is preferable, but it's not necessary to remove the source if a substitute cannot be found.
4. The general issue here Gerda is not that any one of these sources can't be used on its own in a limited way but the fact that so many of the sources are WP:PRIMARYWP:SELFPUBLISHED sources, and that there are very few independent secondary sources used; none of which address the subject "directly and in detail". This is a blatant fail to follow WP:PSTS policy which states "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Per WP:No original research and WP:SIGCOV we should not be building articles predominantly from these type of materials. This is an issue of source balance, and more broadly following the spirit of how we go about article construction under wikipedia's general notability guidelines for what makes a topic encyclopedic.
It's helpful. I just return from the opera. It is a cultural institution. I have company, so more tomorrow. I have five reviews that I found already in my sandbox. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the article title include '(mezzo-soprano)' next to her name? It seems unnecessary, as there appears to be no other individual named Cecelia Hall with whom she could be confused. Gor1995đ14:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
750, thank you for taking this up! You may have seen in the history that I began this article, but 4meter4, not convinced of the reliability of some sources, added many sources and much of the content, - I offered to 4meter4 to nominate this for GA, but decided - once it was that much improved - to do it.
Juilliard School in New York City, achieving a master's degree in 2011. ==> Juilliard School in New York City and achieved a master's degree in 2011.
In 2016, Hall used her North Carolina accent to great effect as Ruby could we explain what "great effect" means in a footnote?
I don't know. English is not my first language, - is sounds concise and self-explanatory to me. She had this accent after growing up there, which the role needed, so it came naturally to her, which added to the effectiveness pf her portrayal, - that's what I understand. As it happens, I spent three months in North Carolina, and years later I was told in New York State that I had a Southern accent. --GA
In May 2024, she is scheduled to perform the title role in Bizet's Carmen with the Austin Lyric Opera,[67] and perform as the alto soloist in Mozart's Requiem with the New York Philharmonic and Musica Sacra under conductor Kent Tritle.[68] i'd recommend removing the second "perform".
1 OK (the source says "27", which would be around 1985)
5 OK
13 and 14 OK
32 OK
38 OK
45 OK
52 OK
56 OK
63 OK
67 OK
68 OK
I'd recommend archiving the sources, but other than that I'm happy to pass the source review. Earwig shows an unlikely copyright violation figure of 13.8%. 750h+08:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So essentially you just go to âView historyâ and under where it says âFilter revisionâ, youâll see âFix dead linksâ, press that. once you get there, tick the bar that says âAdd archives to all non-dead references (Optional)â and press analyze! 750h+10:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. (I need a ping only when you think I'm not responding in a reasonable time.) I signed on, and managed! - I believe that none of the steps looked self-explanatory ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
