Talk:Cauldron (video game)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pedro J. the rookie 19:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
My main concern with this artical is how short it is, and that you have mixed the gameplay with the plot.
Concerns:
Make a plot section separte it from the Gameplay.Look for more reviews if you can.It has a sequel so make a section of legacy or sequel with info about devolopment.But it it has a sequel add some info on the articalYou do not link the devoloper in the artical.- Consider having it copy-edited
- There's not to many faults but the ones that are here are quite big so work on it, i will put it on hold for some days. --Pedro J. the rookie 19:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- The only point I addressed so far was the Palace Software link in the article. In regard to the others:
- The plot in the article is only two sentences. I can probably elaborate it to three, but the game's plot is very simple. That's why I integrated it into the gameplay, because the plot is very short and mainly serves as a brief explanation for the setting and objective.
- The few reviews not included were redundant to what's already in the article. Basically, adding them won't really lengthen the article.
- Same this with the sequel. The basic information is so short, a separate section felt like undue weight. There is information about development, but it felt best to include that in its own article: Cauldron 2: The Pumpkin Strikes Back.
- I will seek a fresh set of eyes to copy edit the article.
- I know this article is short, but I tried to make it representative of the coverage received (which wasn't like what games normally receive today). There really isn't much that can been done about that aspect. (Guyinblack25 talk 12:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC))
- The articles has been given a sweep. Let me know if you have any other suggestions. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC))
- The only point I addressed so far was the Palace Software link in the article. In regard to the others:
No more, it's done, paass. --Pedro J. the rookie 02:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)