Talk:Cattenom Nuclear Power Plant

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Under Events "There were several incidents involving casualties" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmaltese (talk • contribs) 18:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the word "casualties" is too strong a word in the context of a minor accident Casualty 1. An accident, especially one involving serious injury or loss of life. 2. One injured or killed in an accident: a train wreck with many casualties. ...

I suggest a better wording such as "minor accident" or "security concern" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmaltese (talk • contribs) 17:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ranking

Is adding ranking really a good idea? and if it is, shouldn't a cite or ref be added to link to a specific page?

That information is in the lead section, but it is not mentioned in the article itself, so it is missing the source. It'll change and seems to already have changed (seeing the current List of nuclear power stations, which puts it on 12th place).

I'll update it with the new ranking, but I don't particularly like the lack of linking. --Prr273 (talk) 09:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]