Jump to content

Talk:Catholic Memorial High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Cmh.jpg

[edit]

Image:Cmh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Objective information

[edit]

Thanks for any work you can do to improve this school page. Please keep in mind that all information should be objective, unbiased, encyclopedic, and verifiable (cited from a reliable source). Please do not revert the hard work of editors who try to make this page fall under these guidelines. -- ForgottenManC (talk) 16:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It could still use a lot of cleanup (i.e., removal). Lists of clubs and classes aren't usually notable, for instance. I'll wait to see if anyone has objections, then remove them. tedder (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This definitely looks like an advertisement for the school.Milesper (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Catholic Memorial High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Encourage/require

[edit]

The school requires students to attend mass, penance, and retreats. This is an important point, because it is what differentiates the school from a non-religious one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milesper (talkcontribs) 01:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide a reliable source for that assertion, you can add it to the article. 32.218.32.184 (talk) 16:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Catholic Memorial High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Controversial mascot

[edit]

Editor for this section references probable self-written external article and does not provide a neutral POV.

Mordalf (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Mordalf[reply]


The Crusader mascot is controversial, which is not in dispute since there is longstanding controversy over the use of this mascot at other institutions as well. Since this section merely refers to the controversy there is no problem with neutrality. Mdf1974 (talk) 14:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Mdf1974[reply]

The section should be removed. One person reaching out to the school and 'wishing to sever all ties' does not constitute controversy enough to have it covered on Wikipedia. If it becomes a community issue rather than just a one-person issue (complete with significant coverage in reliable sources), I'll entertain re-adding it. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 20:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed this again. Adding "controversy" to any article should be supported by a reliable source that describes the actual controversy. It is not sufficient to;

  • conduct original research to demonstrate and raise the opinion that a Wikipedia editor thinks it is controversial.
  • link to a single opinion piece where one person doesn't like something.

--Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]