Jump to content

Talk:Catholic Church in Azerbaijan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCatholic Church in Azerbaijan was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 15, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

The big problem with this article is its sparse and shallow coverage of the subject. Aside from being too short, it also happens to read like a timeline--short, one-line sentence that give a year and an event. For GA, this article would have to go into more detail on certain key aspects, such key figures, actions, events, churches, etc. For articles on religion (which involve fancy churches and people), images are a must as well.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    one result of brief subject coverage is short, often one-line sentences and paragraphs. This article and its sections need more development--background, explanation, analysis, etc. External link sections usually come after references.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Sources are present, but draw heavily from "Catholic World News", and about half of the sources focus on either the building of a new church of Pope JP2's visit. Both content and names of sources need to diversify.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    This is the biggest problem; the first sentence of the article's body talks about the first century AD, yet the 20th and 21st centuries each get their own sections. Why is coverage of the 18 centuries in between so sparse? Again, the article is right now little more than a historical timeline. To qualify as "broad coverage", it will need to do more than mention dates and events.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    if/when the article gets longer, more images will be able to fit within it.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good job on the work so far, and good luck in improving the article.

Malachirality (talk) 23:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title?

[edit]

The usual title would be "Roman Catholic Church in Azerbaijan" like most other country articles, consider moving? Hugo999 (talk) 08:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC) I stand corrected - that is for the category, not the article Hugo999 (talk) 08:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Catholic Church in Azerbaijan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Catholic Church in Azerbaijan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Catholic_Church_in_Azerbaijan&oldid=1199475528"