Talk:Cathedral School for Boys

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cathedral School for Boys article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

California: San Francisco Bay Area

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reasoning for assessment: It has little information and can use much more. It is not a stub, for it gives a general idea of the subject. It is of low importance. GreaterWikiholic 01:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral School for Boys received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Observations

The school is certainly not located in the cathedral's sacristy. It's not right to say that "CSB is one of the only American schools that has one..." (a choir? Lots of boy's schools have choirs). I don't even think that Grace and National Cathedral are the only Episcopal cathedrals with choir schools anymore. I don't like the Philosophy section much either; it reads like a copy of some committee's mission statement. It looks too self-promotional to be encyclopedic. -- BPMullins | Talk 03:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I shall improve it and remove the philosophy section. Thanks for the help GreaterWikiholic 23:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Pictures

Is it possible if somebody finds or takes a picture of the school and places it on the article. Thanks. GreaterWikiholic 22:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's remarkably un-photogenic, squeezed into the corner of the cathedral close as it is. It doesn't really have a fancy face to turn to the world at all. There's a doorway on Sacramento Street and that's about it. If I've got a camera with me the next time I'm up there I'll see what I can do. (There is a mural of the founding of the school in the cathedral itself, with portraits of Dean Bartlett and Bishop Pike. That might make a good illustration if you can find an image.) -- BPMullins | Talk 00:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does not really matter if the school has a pretty face to show. As long as it shows information to whoever is interested. A picture of the Sacramento Street Entrance will serve the article well, the Mural for the founding will look good in the history section. I shall seek a picture of the emblem and the mural if I can find one that comlpies with the Image Use Policy. Thanks for the help.GreaterWikiholic 02:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Marlith ^T/C 17:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

Does anyone here know about the schools history. I am a 2008 so I won't know much and the calendar I cited wast not that helpful, few sites on the internet can give much info. Perhaps I can recruit someone. Marlith ^T/C 23:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

As with most school pages, notability is difficult. Please include in this article why this particular school is notable. Avoid using the "there are other non-notable schools too" argument. Most schools are not notable and eventually deleted. I believe this one can achieve a status of notability if an effort is made to do so. -- Kainaw^(what?) 17:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen notable events happen at the school. But I cannot find many third party resources to cite. Thanks. Marlith ^T/C 21:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's getting better. Are there any news articles about Mr. Pierson? If we can get one on him that will be great. Marlith ^T/C 22:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found a whole bunch of article from google news. But can't use them!Marlith ^T/C 02:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cited only the ones that were free, and got a whole bunch of trivia from the school's magazine. Marlith ^T/C 03:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BLAST! Do the Red & Golds give ANYTHING but trivia? Marlith ^T/C 03:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't really cite many third party sources because I am too young to pay for it. Marlith ^T/C 03:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks good. Personally, I'd leave the notice up for a couple months to catch the eye of other editors and get more help with citing the article. -- Kainaw^(what?) 18:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. Still it must be expanded to be like the other articles covered by Wikiproject schools. Marlith ^T/C 19:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, the second master was PETER KEATING!!!! Marlith ^T/C 18:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need to check it for factual accuracy. Marlith ^T/C 03:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "notability" of alumni also needs to be argued. Only one of those presently listed has any apparent reason other than vanity for being on the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.157.211.214 (talk) 14:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]
Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.^[?]
This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.^[?]
There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.
As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]^[?]
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 00:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marlith ^T/C 03:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cathedral School for Boys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723035712/http://www.cathedralschool.net/s/771/index.aspx?sid=771&gid=1&pgid=284 to http://www.cathedralschool.net/s/771/index.aspx?sid=771&gid=1&pgid=284

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni

I've temporarily removed the alumni section [1] as none of entries have refs for attendance, either in this article or in the subjects' articles. Meters (talk) 19:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the entries for which I found reliable sources. I could not source Warren Breidenbach, and Charles Lowrey does not have a Wikipedia article (the entry was a pipe). Meters (talk) 20:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]