Talk:Casting Crowns (album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jclemens (talk · contribs) 05:59, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Overall, this article is in outstanding shape. I didn't check every single ref, because there are so MANY of them, but it strikes me that this could have been nominated without needing to be quite this polished. Without any suggestions to make, this becomes just a certification process, rather than the collaborative evaluation that I actually like better than just rubber-stamping articles.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Fine.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Fine.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Good.

C. No original research:
Good.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Fine.

B. Focused:
Fine.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
I actually didn't know that anyone in the industry didn't like the album. Good job finding some not-entirely-positive commentary for NPOV.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Fine.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
File:American Dream.ogg and File:03 Who Am I.ogg both need FURs for this article. Whew! I thought I was going to get all the way through this article without finding anything to nitpick! :-) I know they're not "images" per se, but we need to use FURs appropriately on any media that needs it. I'll see about updating the rules to make this explicit.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Fine.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
On hold for the trivial corrections needed. :-) Jclemens (talk) 05:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And with the FURs added... pass. Jclemens (talk) 15:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]