Talk:Casa Linda Estates, Dallas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Casa Linda Estates, Dallas be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Casa Linda Estates, Dallas/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Could use photos, verifiable boundaries, educational information and Parks information. drumguy8800 C T 12:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 00:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Casa Linda Estates, Dallas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061103024356/http://maps.dallascityhall.com/otherservices/cd09_e.pdf to http://maps.dallascityhall.com/otherservices/cd09_e.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC) – Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 15:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 May 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. Don't see general agreement to rename the "Casa Linda..." article and call that "no consensus" to move. See consensus not to move the "Ola..." article. So both articles will retain their present titles. Ola, Texas will become a disambiguation page with two entries. Have a Great Day and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 19:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– Casa Linda Estates, Dallas should be moved to Casa Linda, Texas per WP:USPLACE. Casa Linda is no longer called "Ola", so Ola, Kaufman County, Texas should be moved to Ola, Texas over the redirect (there is distinguish hatnote at the current Ola, Kaufman County, Texas). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure on the first proposal–is there any evidence of this? The external site linked from the article still uses "Casa Linda Estates." Inclined to oppose the second move: whether a name is current or former shouldn't have much bearing on whether or not disambiguation is necessary. If readers and editors tend to mean Casa Linda Estates, Dallas (or Casa Linda, Texas) when they look for Ola, Texas, then the redirect does not need to be altered. Perhaps there are other reasons to move the second page, but this does not seem to be sufficient. Dekimasuよ! 20:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dekimasu: Sorry not to be clear about the first proposal: it's not the "Estates" bit that's wrong, it's the "Dallas" bit, because "Articles on populated places in the United States are typically titled Placename, State." Casa Linda Estates, Texas would be fine. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the request is for Casa Linda Estates, Texas, then I would oppose if this is actually in Dallas, and support if it is not actually in Dallas, in line with what Amakuru has written below. The article seems to indicate that the area was annexed by Dallas before the current name came into use. Dekimasuよ! 21:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose first per other entries in Category:Neighborhoods in East Dallas. As this is not an incorporated place in its own right, but merely a suburb of Dallas, it seems preferable to disambiguate that it's part of Dallas rather than in the state of Texas. Also oppose second per Dekimasu. The Ola in Kaufman County appears to be tiny and it's likely that people will still be looking for the renamed neighbourhood under that title. We could instead change it to a disambiguation page though, I suspect neither of them is the primary topic for Ola. — Amakuru (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.