Talk:Cartmanland

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Paramount Pictures#Paramount Home Entertainment|Paramount Home Entertainment]] Anchor Paramount Pictures#Paramount Home Entertainment links to a specific web page: Paramount Home Entertainment. The anchor (#Paramount Home Entertainment) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Stop deleting the plot hole in this episode. Yes, this was a great episode, and the plot hole was barely noticeable, which is why it deserves attention. If you delete it, please give an explanation why it's wrong it or why it shouldn't be put up.

To whomever keeps deleting stuff without giving a reason: I've contacted wikipedia to stop you vandalizing the page. I don't know if you'll get banned for doing this, but I thought you'd like to know.Jbm867 17:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it both because it's original research as presented and is not a plot hole. The owner says he can't keep up enough attendance to make a profit while Cartman complains about the lines being long... Evidently, an inadequate number of people visited the park to turn a profit, but enough to make Cartman complain about lines. United Airlines went bankrupt even with scads of customers -- just not enough to cover costs. Tuf-Kat 01:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha, Wiki doesn't allow original research! Why does that not surprise me? Even if it was common sense I bet. This is because they presume: A. You're probably too stupid to make any conclusions, and B. They like to maintain a "mainstream view" which might be challenged by original research. Screw Wiki.

I didn't know about the original research policy, so I guess that would suffice as a reason for removal. Still, it is a plot hole. First, Cartman didn't complain about "just enough" people to bother him. In his diatribe, he goes on about how the lines were so long that they had to invent speed pass, among other things. Second, even though an argument can be made about overhead costs being the reason for financial ruin, it wouldn't apply here because the original owner bought back the park anyway in order to make a profit.

Hmm, to the guy that thinks there is a plothole, it is clear that Cartman is talking about amusement parks in general. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.204.36.103 (talk) 05:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took out the part about Stan having brown/black hair as pertaining to his disguise. Obviously he has black hair, but he's in disguise...

Kenny's death

I noticed that someone noted that, in Cartman's defense, Kenny dies all the time. The whole idea is the fact that Cartman has some defense in his lawsuit - Kenny had been standing up on the roller-coaster, which is prohibited on roller-coasters. This would've almost certainly given Cartman some help in his lawsuit. 87.84.59.36 (talk) 19:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big deal, that's your own original research and not mentioned in the episode. I replaced the line with a quote from Cartman. Alastairward (talk) 07:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess your idea was the solution to his problem, whatever that was. Grieferhate (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disneyland

Is Cartmanland really a parody of Disneyland? If it was, I would have thought it would mock typical Disney things, like how (allegedly) Disney employees are treated, how everything is happy and expensive, how they want your money, etc. I think Cartmanland is an archeatype (spelt that wrong) of theme parks in general. Maybe I missed something here.Jbm867 04:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Book of Job

I took out the comment about it being curious that Kyle's parents read out of the book of Job, as it's a Christian book. I looked it up online and found that the book of Job is in the Old Testament, which I think is a part of the bible that Jewish people believe in. I did more research and found this [1] where it talks about the book of Job. Jbm867 04:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that doesn't change the fact that he is being read to out of a bible. — Mütze 09:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article didn't make clear that in the Book of Job God actually did kill Job's children, just as South Park showed. God gave Job new children by the end of the Old Testament. Ariadne55 16:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, that's a dubious distinction. And I doubt Job's old children were too pleased about it either way. 206.180.38.20 17:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Owner of the Theme park

At the end of the episode, the owner says, "i dont care, says pierre" in reference to the book Pierre: A Cautionary Tale in 5 Chapters and a Prologue by Maurice Sendak. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.139.145.136 (talk) 03:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

"more so than if he had never acquired the park"

I removed part of a sentence, the original went something like: "Cartman was extremely miserable and frustrated; more so than if he had never acquired the park in the first place." The second half of this sentence doesn't seem important to the story, and unless its based on an actual quote in the episode, in which case it should probably be attributed, it seems like its just an obversation, and not really suited to inclusion in the article. If there is an actual quote in the ep., and people think its important enough to need to be included, I would reccommend something like: "Character x observed that Cartman appeared to be more unhappy than he would have been if he had never acquired the park." LewisNiet (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]