Jump to content

Talk:Carmen Casco de Lara Castro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCarmen Casco de Lara Castro has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 19, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 2, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Carmen Casco de Lara Castro, founder of one of the first human rights organizations in Latin America, was arrested, denied a passport, and monitored by the Stroessner regime?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 17, 2018, and June 17, 2023.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Carmen Casco de Lara Castro/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kudpung (talk · contribs) 22:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GAN checklist
  • Copy edit  Done
  • Proofread  Done

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (No original research): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Bot Link check. I haven't checked these yet. They are possibly mainly the redlinks.

Status URL Source link text
 Done SusunW (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to resolve.
I have no idea how to resolve that the original website is dead. With most Latin American sources, they seem to be unstable and die within a few months, which is why I always save them in wayback. Is there something technical I need to do when the original link no longer works? SusunW (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I removed it as you suggested, since it is covered in another source. SusunW (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung Thank you so very much for taking on this review. Cannot tell you how much it is appreciated. I fixed the es.WP link, I don't know what to do regarding the other one. Archive link works, live link doesn't. The Facebook page for the Concepción News has not had any posts since March 2018, so they may be defunct. SusunW (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually covered by source No.2, so you can delete the offending dead link.mKudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]