Talk:Carlton House Terrace

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Who Is In Number 18?

It is said that the East part of the Terrace is numbered 10 - 18. There is no mention of 18 in the list of current occupants. Is 18 combined with 17? Or was it left off by mistake? Or is it hidden because of a cunning plan by Sir Pellinore Gwaine-Cust? I think we should be told. 95.149.54.104 (talk) 16:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering

If the numbers only go to 18, how is there a business in number 20?

And who is in number 19? 213.205.240.134 (talk) 10:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am. But, shh. 2A00:23C5:E097:5D00:4978:4D17:492B:70DC (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Belatedly - It is all a bit confusing, and I can’t find an explicit reference to Number 19. This, very good, blog explains the layout of 20-24 well, but as a blog it’s not useable.[1] Perhaps the Survey of London will help. KJP1 (talk) 12:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In Fiction

There is such a section in the article on The Albany, and several other parts of London. Why not have an In Fiction section for Carlton House Terrace as well? 95.149.54.104 (talk) 11:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, I have seen some reference to it in thrillers, and will get some info once I have the references. 96.90.200.185 (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlton House Terrace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080304120054/http://www.privy-council.org.uk:80/output/page21.asp to http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/page21.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlton House Terrace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303174630/http://www.motco.com/map/81003/ to http://www.motco.com/map/81003/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers 19-24

Despite Survey of London, No. 18 is clearly part of the Nash scheme. I think it should say 19 to 24 were built later. That would put 19 at the very eastern end of the street, and 20-24 on the northern side, which fits with this, [2].Need to find suitable R/S to clarify all this. KJP1 (talk) 13:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]