Talk:Carlos Paredes

Biography: Musicians / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Portugal Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I reverted to an older edit of this article because it had been trimmed back to just Paredes' name and vital dates. The summary for the earlier edit that had so trimmed the article said that the editor had removed all content that was not sourced after two months. The previous edit before his (which I reverted to) did not have in-line requests for sourcing, nor any talk in the discussion tab about what he would like sourced. In lieu of specific sourcing requests, I think it best to keep an substantive article such as it is rather than a bare one. D.E. Cottrell (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two things. 1) Reverting back to an article version from July of 2009 did far more than merely add back in the unsourced text that had been removed. 2) Per WP:BURDEN, part of the core WP policy of verifiability,

"The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The source should be cited clearly and precisely, with page numbers where appropriate, and must clearly support the material as presented in the article. If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."

I have no problem with the claims, if they are verifiable to some reliable secondary source . Otherwise, the uncited assertions should stay out of Wikipedia until sources are found and citations added. Cheers. N2e (talk) 04:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article sourcing

The article on the (claimed, but no sources) Portuguese musician Carlos Paredes has been fact-tagged for sources since July 2009. After no sources were provided, much of the unsourced material was removed in October 2009. This remained the status quo for many months. A bit more unsourced material was removed (article still fact-tagged since "July 2009") on March 5th.

An anon editor, whom I assume operated in good faith, reverted the article on March 14th clear back to the article state of August 2009—including removing about a half dozen edits by several editors that were entirely unrelated to the unsourced material changes—and added back all of the uncited assertions about Mr. Paredes. Several attempts I made to revert the recent large additions of unsourced material have been reverted by other editors, for whom I also assume good faith. Discussion on the Talk page has not prevented the unsourced material from being repeatedly added.

My take is that, per WP:V and WP:BURDEN, the unsourced claims should be left out of Wikipedia until they are sourced. Input from other editors would be most welcome. N2e (talk) 18:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Carlos Paredes is not Brazilian. He is Portuguese.

I have corrected my inadvertant misreference in the Talk page, above. In the article, I merely added a {{citation needed}} tag to whatever the assertion was that was made in the article. N2e (talk) 00:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2. You should read the rules more carefully: referencing is desired, _but not required_ for non-controvercial material.Galassi (talk) 10:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The many assertions about Carlos Paredes do need to be sourced, if the claims are to remain in Wikipedia. I have added {{citation needed}} tags to a few of the claims that seem to have no support in any verifiable reliable source in the article. Cheers. N2e (talk) 15:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]