Talk:Carl Walther GmbH

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

pop culture

List of trivia don't belong in wikipedia (see what wikipedia is not: WP:NOT, specifically "lists of trivia"). If anything the Smith&Wesson page needs to be trimmed. Listing each occurrence of a walther in every film or video games is almost completely insignificant. If we are talking about the S&W Model 29 and the Dirty Harry movies, then yes the pop culture connotation becomes significant. For trivial list of appearances, please see List of firearms in video games and List of firearms in films. --Deon Steyn 06:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P99

I hardly would consider the P99 "legendary". P38 and PPK yes. P99 no.

I can add: P99 was the gun not only of James Bond, but also gun of German policeman Alexander Brandtner from "Kommissar Rex" TV series (do you remember the famous German Shepherd?). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.0.210.102 (talk) 15:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

Shouldn't be rename this to Carl Walther GmbH or similar, and then make Walther a redirect or disambig. In the long-term Walther is likely to have conflicts. Arthurrh 20:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The rename to "Walther arms" wasn't an improvement. "arms" isn't part of the actual name of the company, after all. 24.214.230.66 (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously this has been

Done at some point --BjKa (talk) 11:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Walter 938.jpg

Image:Walter 938.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Walther P99 .jpg

Image:Walther P99 .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Walther PPK gun.jpg

Image:Walther PPK gun.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

If you combine the Pronunciation of vulture and of ulteration into something like Vulter, you're really really close to the correct pronunciation of Walther (just the german l sounds a bit different). My main point being, that the "a" sounds different from the "a" in the american name Walter.
Didn't put it in the article, cos it would have to be combined properly with what's already there, plus I think it might be a bit silly. --BjKa (talk) 12:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it Walter and then there's an "h" between the "l" and "t"? Or is it just me? I always pronounce it like "Wall" and then "thur".--Rollersox (talk) 19:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The h is silent. Makes absolutely no difference to pronunciation if it is there or not. It is a remnant of old spelling, that mostly got reformed in 1901, but can still be found in personal names and place names like Rothenburg or Thüringen. --BjKa (talk) 10:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I'm concerned (I speak British English), 'vaulter' has an 'aw' sound like in 'all', so it isn't a good rendering of the German pronunciation.213.127.210.95 (talk) 16:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major Problem

The Walther Arms company is NOT Carl Walther GMBH. Whoever renamed this page screwed up big time!!!
Furthermore, there is precious little of actual Walther history under the history section. And there is NOTHING about Walther Arms history.
Digitallymade (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop "SHOUTING", and over-using exclamation points (!!!). Second, it's more helpful if you provide reliable sources here for your claims, so that others can see your evidence and help out if needed, or provide counter sources if they believe your interpretation of the evidence is wrong. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit

Preserving here by proving this link. My rationale was: "WP:CATALOG: excessive and promotional detail; uncited; unneeded self-citations; rm red linked entries". Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zella-Mehlis

The article currently says: "Zella-Mehlis, in what was then Hesse but is today Thuringia."
I don't think Zella-Mehlis was ever in Hesse. According to de:Zella-Mehlis it would probably have belonged to Saxe-Gotha at the time. I'm removing the "Hesse" part of the sentence. --BjKa (talk) 11:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]