Talk:Carl Hilsenberg
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Carl Hilsenberg be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Notability query
[edit]The facts that this person has a recognised botanical abbreviation, and is the author of a valid zoological specific epithet, are sufficient to establish notability. Maias (talk) 07:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I can understand the "notablility" of a botanical name, but that in mind is no where near enough for this article to remain. Simply having a botanical abbreviation is not enough to make the person, nor this page, acceptable to remain here. By all means, pull the tag if you would like to, but really, with no references, no sources other than said abbreviation, this seriously needs to come down.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- Stub-Class bird articles
- Low-importance bird articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- Wikipedia requested images of botanists