Talk:Car costs
 | Car costs received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Car costs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Kinetic speed vs virtual speed
[edit]I'm sorry but the section being removed here is just strange. Giving it this much attention is obviously WP:UNDUE and that's ignoring a whole host of other problems (WP:FRINGE and the fact that it's just kooky).Volunteer Marek (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- There is no WP:UNDUE because there are not many "ideological" points of view to make this approach. In the text there were not given moral approaches to benefits or negative consequences of driving. The article is about car financial expenditures on a scientific approach, so that chapter was stricted related (WP:Content removal). Besides, removing a whole chapter (again) without any debate seems to me a big domineering aptitude and disrespect towards the others. I will not though create an edition war. João Pimentel Ferreira 10:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Content removed
[edit]It seems Marek woke up one day and didn't like what he saw on this article and decided to remove a series of sentences, multimedia, even a chapter and also reliable sources to such issues, without giving any notice to others. Thank for your volunteering collaboration. João Pimentel Ferreira 10:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Car costs to income ratio
[edit]Why this phrase (just the phrase) was removed?
Motorists in the United Kingdom seem to spend on the car an average of roughly 1/3 of their average net income,[1] while motorists in Portugal seem to spend 1/2 of their net income.[2] This situation is reflected in most other Western nations. For the average car owner, depreciation constitutes about half the cost of running a car.[1] The typical motorist underestimates this fixed cost by big margin, or even ignores it altogether.[3]
- ^ a b Osborne, Hilary (2006-10-20). "Cost of running a car 'exceeds £5,000'". The Guardian. London: Guardian Media Group.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
estatística dos custos do automóvelwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Meek, James (2004-12-20). "The slow and the furious". The Guardian. London: Guardian Media Group.
Road tax does NOT have to go into roads
[edit]In the tax section, it says "taxes serve, either to maintain the roads and all the correspondent infrastructures or to compensate the negative externalities caused by the motor vehicles. " I can very definitely tell you that is (regrettably) NOT the case in Germany. State revenue from the VED ist just lumped in with all the other tax money and the state spends it as it sees fit. There is no obligation whatsoever to spend it on roads or any damage caused by cars. Same goes for the "environmental tax" levied on fuel which is just a second fuel tax.--Cancun (talk) 11:14, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- You are right, but theoretically is that the purpose. What do you say if one writes "taxes serve theoretically, to maintain the roads and all the correspondent infrastructures and to compensate the negative externalities caused by the motor vehicles."? João Pimentel Ferreira 10:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joao.pimentel.ferreira (talk • contribs)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Car costs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719141734/http://www.sustainabilitycentre.com.au/TransportCosts.pdf to http://www.sustainabilitycentre.com.au/TransportCosts.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Examples
[edit]The article could use a comparison of several cars, under the same year, under the same location (state), comparing occasion costs. A fictive re-used (but actual car model)car example might be given as well, supposing we can't have easily a comparisong between used car. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.193.35.108 (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)