Talk:Capitol Hill Babysitting Co-op

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Should we move this article to "Capitol hill babysitting co-op," because it's consistent with U.S. spelling conventions and Wikipedia's capitalization policy?--Dark Charles (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think probably not since it's a proper name. Also the sources listed capitalize the name. Gobonobo ^T ^C 22:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough.--Dark Charles (talk) 22:49, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo credit

A note on the photos and photo credits – I found the photos in "The Capitol Hill Babysitting Coop: Celebrating its 50th Year of Community Childcare", and asked Rudi Schreiber (at the time of the article president of the co-op) for permissions to the photos, which he, or rather his wife, Susan Hormuth (at the time “first lady/first family”), who had taken the photos, kindly granted. I was given to believe that they preferred visible attribution, rather than the discreet “only on the photo page itself” that is often found on Wikipedia, hence why the photos are credited. As Susan actually is relevant to the co-op (as noted, being quite involved), I assume this isn’t a problem, but wanted to explain the reasoning.

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive Krugman references

A note on the extensive Krugman references (e.g., as in this edit); I think them valuable for two reasons – firstly, because Krugman gives different details in different ones (e.g., the technical note of a one-good economy), and secondly, because these occur over a number of years (the 15-year span 1994–2009 so far), they can reflect change or constancy in Krugman’s interpretation (and in critiques, notably Austrian), and thus have scholarly interest. Hope y’all find the bibliography valuable!

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Fiction

There was a comedy on BBC Radio 4 some time ago in which a Machiavellian economist used his babysitting group and its currency to conduct experiments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.248.158 (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. However, I don't think it quite makes the cut, because this is an actual babysitting group.--Dark Charles 15:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't make myself clear - I was suggesting that the Capitol Hill Babysitting Co-op (and academic interest in it) inspired the comedy. (I've searched on google for information but can't find any - it may have aired up to 20 years ago.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.248.166 (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if you can find a source, putting something in would be fine.--Dark Charles 19:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capitol Hill Babysitting Co-op. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090527130941/http://www.pkarchive.org:80/theory/MINIMAC.html to http://www.pkarchive.org/theory/MINIMAC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]