Talk:Capel St Mary

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Capel St Mary article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Churches

Does anyone know the ages of the churches? Currently: "very old Anglican church" and "Baptist church ... quite new". Rich (talk) 20:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found the age of St Mary's. I don't think the ages of the other two churches are as important so I've left those out. Brammers (talk) 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessed to Start-class

I have reassessed this article to start-class. It's not too far from a C-class page, but could be developed further. Examples of articles about British villages that are of high quality include Wormshill, Hale Barns and Neilston, which may provide inspiration. The guideline WP:UKTOWNS may be of assistance too, as might St. Mary#s19 this and anything in this lot. Hope that helps, and good luck :) --Jza84 | Talk 23:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessed to C-class

After adding some fairly generic sections on demography and economy which are mostly made up of statistics, I've reassessed the article to C-class. It might be worth merging the Shopping and health into the economy section. The economy and demography section make useful templates for other settlement articles, all you have to do to re-use them is download the Excel files used as sources and change the stats where appropriate. Nev1 (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Capel St. Mary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]