Talk:Cape Verdean people in São Tomé and Príncipe

Africa: Cape Verde / Sao Tome & Principe

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cape Verde.
	São Tomé and Príncipe portal This article is supported by WikiProject São Tomé and Príncipe.

African diaspora

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removing template

I’ ve removed the template because there is no such “Ethnic group” called Cape Verdean Sao Tomese. Either you are Cape Verdean (with or without Sao Tomese citizenship), either you are Sao Tomese (descending from Cape Verdeans). Ten Islands 13:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fernando Pereira.png

The image Image:Fernando Pereira.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

This article claims things that are false for sure. There cannot be 199.000 people in Sao Tomé from Cape Verdean descent when there are only 180.000 people in the whole country. - FakirNL (talk) 15:24, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out that someone fudged the numbers, as you can see here. Hardly seems worth it keeping this article, if we are talking about 3 thousand people. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for resetting it. The article is not the most important on the Wikipedia, but as long as the information is correct, which is seems to be now, I wouldn't delete it. - FakirNL (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cape Verdean people in São Tomé and Príncipe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313163718/http://www.saotomeandprincipewelfarefund.com:80/ to http://www.saotomeandprincipewelfarefund.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]