Talk:Canyon de Chelly National Monument

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance).

Edit fragment

The following edit was moved here for discussion and rewording. WBardwin 00:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other Less known ruins are around the area. One of the most prominent is the Three Turkey Ruins. It was built by the Anasazi to protect themselves from rival tribes. It is about a 2 hour horse ride down and back up, depending on where you go back up. It is completely on Navajo Land and you must have a navajo guide. One of the best ways to see the ruins is to go to Totsonii Ranch and they will take you down there for a fee and if you make a reservation ahead of time.

==

Comment: The red dot for Canyon de Chelly on the locator map on the page for the Monument is located over in eastern Arkansas!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.251.17.176 (talk) 17:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is monument canyon the same as Monument Valley?

dm (talk) 02:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not at all; monument canyon is in the Canyon de Chelly National Monument, south east of Spider Rock (see [1]), Monument Valley is something totally different. --Ajnem (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeological and geological information needed

The article is missing information pertaining to the geology, archeology and history of the so called Canyon de Chelly National Moument. There is nothing here about the numerous cliff ruins (eg Casa Blanca aka White House) and excavations conducted within the park boundaries. There are some old gooks eg Annual report of the Bureau of American ..., Volume 16, Parts 1894-1895 by Smithsonian http://books.google.com/books?id=UUsSAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA146&dq=white+house+ruin+canyon+de+chelly&hl=en&ei=e6CcTs7kJ-rp0QHPhoCJCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAA#v=twopage&q&f=false and I am sure there are newer ones too - — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarioTW (talk • contribs) 21:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

perhaps this entry, i.e. Canyon de Chelly, is a case-in-point of how National Park Service, with its limited funding and short-staffed, is unable or unwilling to engage in professional archaeological excavations within its jurisdictions, depraving us of knowledge regarding the prehistory of these sites - see this book A new deal for southeastern archaeology by Edwin A. Lyon http://books.google.com/books?id=M7B6iUbiL-kC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarioTW (talk • contribs) 22:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment is a complete misunderstanding of the NPS's status here. This is part of the Navajo reservation and is a living community. It is their land, and no one has the right to excavate here. They aren't exactly happy with the NPS running it in any case, as they feel they should be able to do that themselves. Dougweller (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Major gaps in article

1. Its fascinating history.

2. A discussion of the community that lives there today. You could easily miss the scant mention of the canyon community.

I have the resources to do this, let's see if I have the time. Dougweller (talk) 05:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Canyon de Chelly National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Red location dot

BUT the link to the enlarged map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Usa_edcp_relief_location_map.png does not show any red dot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.216.245 (talk • contribs) 12:32, 2017 December 30 (UTC)

The linked enlarged map is the base map that is used to show locations in thousands of articles in tens of Wikipedias. Your point is good that readers may expect the linked enlarged map to show the location dot. Please consider submitting a feature request at Wikipedia:Bug reports and feature requests. Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology Sources

As of 27 Jul 2023 there's a maintenance tag for citations for the Etymology section. I was able to find a couple of sources that confirm the first part of what had been written. I have been unable to find any others to support the rest of the paragraph, however. I will reach out to the NPS to see if someone at the NM can assist, but I did not feel that removing the tag was appropriate as most of the section can still use citations. OneEarDrummer (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]