User talk:DarioTW

Welcome!

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. /ninly (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

Re your edit to Jogaila. Three things:

Generally, links are added only once. For example, Queen Jadwiga is linked at the beginning of the article and therefore not linked further down.
Common words (like hunting, alliance, etc.) are not linked. See also WP:Links
If you want to ask for citation, please use {{fact}}. This is a template that will generate the proper tag. Note that the word "fact" is surrounded by double curly brackets.

Thanks, Renata (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome DarioTW! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Piotrus! DarioTW (talk) 23:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Jasne, przesunalem. Zobacz WP:MOVE po wiecej informacji. Sprobuj rozbudowac i dodac na T:TDYK! Pozdr, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 23:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Chojnice

Hi Dario! I have added some stuff to the article of the Battle of Chojnice and I see that you have done some editing there yourself. According to the editing history of the article, it seems you have removed some info that contradicts your info. I guess the things you deleted were unreferenced, so that should not be a problem. Now I have added pretty much the same things that you took away, and included some text in the article itself as well. As you can see, this is properly sourced this time, and should therefore not be removed. It's hard to know what information to trust sometimes :) Njaker (talk) 13:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC) hello Njaker, I think your edit gives much better balanced version now - thanks for letting me know[reply]

Mustangs, etc.

Dario, let's discuss this Spanish/Iberian horse/Mustang stuff here instead of across three different article talk pages. You are clearly upset about something, but the things you claim to be upset about appear to be based on misreading an article, not fully understanding the English language, or taking things out of context. So I'd like to figure out what your actual concerns are. I do think all these articles could use some improvements, but they need to be thoughtfully done to meet the criteria of wikipedia for reliability and Verifiability. You have found some good research materials, but seem to be having trouble using them properly. I'd like to help out here, but I also need you to tone down the insults and innuendo. So let's sort it out in one place, OK? Montanabw^(talk) 06:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With all do respect Montanabw, do refrain from patronizing me, and in turn do some learning and studding first - e.g. do read my discussion and suggestions to your reversion to the Iberian horse page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Iberian_horse I am afraid I do not want to discuss the Spanish/Iberian horse/Mustang stuff on my talk page, you can do it on yours. My concerns are simple - accuracy, historicity, and current research. I admit to not using proper wikipedia citation method, I guess I prefer the one I learned at the university and scientifically based bibliography list (primary and secondary sources), when possible, (btwy I am fine with my Americana English, my 4th language). So if you would like us to work together ask me for a source (and I usually will have it) and do not undo my additions with 'heavy hand,' simple and civilized method I daresay, in my opinion normally being used on Wikipedia, but then who knows perhaps my English stops me from seeing the 'right' way? howgh!DarioTW (talk) 06:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[...]DarioTW (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dear psychologist aka Montanabw :) - I said not more discussion here, and you are back with your comments this talk page of mine- so I am going to delete yours made after my yesterday's comments - I have grown tired of this pointless exchange - especially I find your acute lack of ability to see subtle metaphor in my calling of 'your' article on mustang - a free horse - a 'donkey' is 'too much rotten hay in this haystack.' I am afraid you and I have nothing to discuss anymore... do retire to your page :) DarioTW (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

done. Montanabw^(talk) 18:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Rutilius Lupus

Hi!

I'm copying here my message on the discussion board, since I presume you haven't seen it and I'd like to hash this over before I make changes:

"Hi,

   The bricks angle looks fascinating - could you please add some specific references? Thumbs up for digging this up, anyway!
   About the edits, I wish to explain the rationale for my culling: the so-called Kitos war is (for us, 2000 years later!) the major reason why Rutilius is inetresting and it should definitely be included in a major way. However, I think it's not necessary to give numerous details about the war itself (especially, as its course is far from actually clear to academic specialists, owing to the paucity and complex nature of the evidence); therefore, I think it's better to stick to the basics on this subject in Rutilius's bio article - fuller details about the war can be given in the article about the war.

So, please have another look at my version:

"Marcus Rutilius Lupus was Prefect of Egypt during the Jewish uprising of 115-117 (the Kitos War). The magnitude of this rebellion was beyond prefect's power to suppress and he needed assistance from Marcius Turbo in quelling and pacifying the province, eventually achieved with enormous loss of life and property."

I think it captures the essentials, without getting bogged down in an unnecessary descriptio of the war itself.

What do you think? Bazuz (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)"

Best wishes!

Bazuz (talk) 20:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

salve, the edit is ok, my only comment might be about the importance of his actions as refuge giver to the non-rebelious Jews of Egypt, quite important in this time of enormous bloodshed. The brick story is very arcane and I have not found more sources but for the ones listed in the article DarioTW (talk) 02:39, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 80,000 pages as Poland-related, out of which 1,500 still need a quality assessment, and 20,000, importance assessment.
we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ.
once an article is assessed it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is another good place to watchlist!)
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on
newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, and its creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project
we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Czcibor

The article Czcibor has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ThePCKid (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Sources added :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.117.182.5 (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYK

Thank you for creating the Czcibor article. Please note that if you were to add few inline references, the article would be eligible for front-line exposure (WP:DYK) at T:TDYK. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good job, just remember that DYKs have deadlines, and if you take too long writing an article, it will not be easy to put it on the front page. But if you do not care about that, than no worries :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to rename Yuri Nemyrych, propose it on talk, but I think the current name is correct. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Karol Bunsch

There are many important articles missing. See User:Piotrus/List of Poles, for example. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silesians

Hello, could you please add sources to your last edit of Silesians? Thank you. Cimmerian praetor (talk) 07:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Brest (1794)

Thank you for your contributions to the article. However, please insert inline citations to indicate where you got the information. You seem to have made several unnecessary changes in language/tone which reflect a more pro-Polish point of view. I understand this as you seem to be from Poland, but make sure your language is as neutral as possible. I would also have split the large paragraph into several smaller ones instead.

this article on the battle of Terespol reeks of ignorance of pertinent sources, facts, research and lack even small knowledge of the complicated times during the end of Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Russian language links have copied, albeit with lots of bias and nit-picking, works by Stanislaw Herbst and Tadeusz Korzon. The last editor is not even knowledgeable of Polish language.... You cna do what you like with the article. I am not touching it at this time after my edit. Additionally, usage of term - 'Polish rebels' - for the Kosciuszko's army is inappropriate and outright wrong as these soldiers were Polish state soldiers fighting the invasion of the evil empires: Russia and Prussia, de facto et de jure partners in crime ( destroying Poland-Lithuania in 1772, '92, '95) who against the norms of international law partitioned a free state, and enslaved its peoples.

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Alexandra of Lithuania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cardinal, Kingdom of Poland and Scion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Folklore and Chivalry

That is a tremendous source sample I am looking forward about the idea the folklore of Native American warrior who became legends throughout the centuries. The Song of Hiawatha coming from the Onondaga, in the 16th century, Shoshone and Comanche, who started nations from about 3,000 B.C.E.( or possibly alot earlier to 5,000 B.C.E.), also reports legendary folkore of two warrior hunters, in The Legend of Manitous Springs, and their chivalrous deed to deal with each other under The Great Spirit Manitou. Many legends chivalrous legends are still out there and hoping to find some sources of warriors and chivalrous deeds back from 4,000 B.C.E. and later on translated to the Modern Age.--GoShow (...............) 17:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yılankale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Bening, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illuminator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An Ancient Tale (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Władysław Żeleński (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Samuel Korecki may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

His [[Korecki]] clan had their residence at Korets]] castle and most likely Samuel was born there to Joachim Korecki and Anna nee Chodkiewicz in 1586.
Korecki]], and five sisters. Prince Samuel married famously beautiful ''Katarzyna''[[Catherina) Movilă]], daughter of [[Ieremia Movilă]]. They had one daughter, [[Anna Korecka]], who married [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Samuel Korecki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ruthenian, Bender, Andrzej Leszczyński and Ştefăneşti

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crown of the Kingdom of Poland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Successor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Bernard Maciejowski, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paweł Stefan Sapieha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pac and Ruthenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Liw, Poland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

economic importance, Austrians dissolved the administrative and territorial unit of ''ziemia liwska]'' and moved the seat of administrative and judicial powers to [[Siedlce]]. In 1807 town became

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kulm law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liw

Liw, Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gord

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
- assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)
Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details.

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland.
Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings.
Newsletter prepared by _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historical novels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grey Ranks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]