Talk:Cantonal and University Library of Fribourg
Multiple issue, where?
[edit]Which part of the article represents the multiple issues that you brought up? @Uncle Bash007
I didn't see any part of the article that I would consider to exemplify WP:FORUM, WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOTGUIDE, and WP:TONE. Fabi Fuu 76 (talk) 16:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Fabi Fuu 76, considering how the article states “mission” and “legal basis” may seem like an advert or manual. Yet, if it is not so, you can change or remove the tag.
- thank you Uncle Bash007 (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. There's a lot of article stating the "legal basis" and "mission". It is perfectly normal for governmental organization. Example for a few: United_States_census#Legal basis, Deutsche_Bundespost#Legal basis, Directive_(European_Union)#Legal basis, International_Committee_of_the_Red_Cross#Legal basis. There's also similar article talking about mission. Well, it it is their mission and their purpose, why we should remove it? Fabi Fuu 76 (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, stating mission and vision may in some cases denote advertisement. Nevertheless, in this I think the way you state it is not indicating advert. I see you removed the tag.
- Thank you, best. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 13:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. There's a lot of article stating the "legal basis" and "mission". It is perfectly normal for governmental organization. Example for a few: United_States_census#Legal basis, Deutsche_Bundespost#Legal basis, Directive_(European_Union)#Legal basis, International_Committee_of_the_Red_Cross#Legal basis. There's also similar article talking about mission. Well, it it is their mission and their purpose, why we should remove it? Fabi Fuu 76 (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)