Talk:Canford Heath

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm afraid Canford heath is not the largest heath in Dorset, let alone the UK! This is misleading and should be ammended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.250.169.17 (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be re-thought as it doesn't clearly depicte the postion of Canford Heath in relation to the town of Poole of which its part and location within the town. Canford Heath is not that near to Sandbanks and this article is written in a misleading way even low the they are both in the same town.

Note I come from Poole and know it well having lived and worked here all my life (41 years). Paulw99 22:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When looking back at this article prior to rewriting it I have noted that there is only reference to one Church, there are in fact three. Canford Heath Baptist Church and St. Paul's Anglican Church share the same premises with the Baptists have their service after that of St. Pauls'. I think this needs a total rewrite unlike I thought of at first. Paulw99 19:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that u shud say more about the heath cuz thats kinda a big part of canford heath and i live ther so i shud know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oinkleworkorelse (talk • contribs) 17:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving

I'm drafting some improvements at Draft:Canford Heath, with intent to merge it with this article when done. Any help would be appreciated. I'm going to look at old newspapers at some point. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canford Heath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626134200/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000913.pdf to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000913.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canford Heath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626104423/http://www.poole.gov.uk/planning-and-buildings/urban-design-and-conservation/sssi-planning-advice-by-natural-england/ to http://www.poole.gov.uk/planning-and-buildings/urban-design-and-conservation/sssi-planning-advice-by-natural-england/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ward

I see Canford Heath (ward) has been redirected to this page without a discussion. The same happened at Penn Hill but I have reverted. What do others think? Moondragon21 (talk) 11:22, 10 November (UTC)

There is no need to have this discussion on every ward article. Per WP:CFORK, we do not create needless forks for the same place, and there is no exception to this rule for electoral wards -- as the recent AfD for Station ward in Boston reiterated. This is especially true for the Penn Hill article, which is even more of a clear cut WP:REDUNDANTFORK as both articles clearly state that they are the same place, and there is no information in either article which couldn't equally apply to the other article. Joe D (t) 12:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]