Talk:Canada–United Arab Emirates aviation dispute

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles

United Arab Emirates

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Canada–United Arab Emirates aviation dispute was copied or moved into Canada–United Arab Emirates relations with this edit on August 5, 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Page move

To Canada - UAE relations or somethign of the sort, if that doesnt exist, it should this is small enough to fill in one section (or even part of)Lihaas (talk) 00:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page is under construction it's not even finished. --Kuzwa (talk) 17:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To the extent that notability requires credible sources, the article about this topic has them (e.g., CBC; BBC, CP). While it could be merged with the existing Canada - United Arab Emirates relations article, that article is currently only a stub. Radinbc (talk) 22:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merge.

Seeing as the article Canada – United Arab Emirates relations has barely and content wouldn't it be better to merge the two together? Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 02:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense to me. There's no need for this to be a standalone article. PK T(alk) 13:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with merge. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also agree with merge proposal based on overlap of topics and sparse content on main relations page. Canuckle (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]