Talk:Canada–Philippines waste dispute

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 22, 2019.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during the Canada–Philippines waste dispute, Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte threatened to declare war on Canada over 103 mislabeled shipping containers of household trash?

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver / Governments Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

A month overdue

It looks like this article is a month late with any updates. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be dissuaded from making any such updates. The most recent changes in the incident itself that I noted were at the end of May, though I haven't gone through the sources I archived at that time. I'll try and get to it in the next few days if you don't beat me to it. — fourthords | =Λ= | 23:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I have no interest or knowledge of the subject in hand, but it was tagged a while ago and yet still somehow featured on the main page. The Rambling Man (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It hasn't been on the main page yet. It was shuffled to a later prep when the prep was moving to queue because of the tag. --valereee (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great so it'll be fixed. I'd have thought that would be a rudimentary check but I can't comment on that. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rudimentary as in basic? Yeah, I'd call it system working as intended. Review was done, hook was promoted, article was tagged, someone noticed, hook was pulled before being queued. --valereee (talk) 00:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

a push toward comprehensiveness

IAW this edit by SounderBruce (talk · contribs), this article is not "comprehensive enough". Can anybody help with finding the crucial information lacking from the article? If you don't want to integrate it into the article yourself, can you add the sources above and I'll do my best to work them in? Thanks! — fourthords | =Λ= | 17:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With the events of this article concluded, it appears to be B-class to me. Reliable sources are used and the rest of the criteria are satisfied in my opinion. There’s likely minor improvements necessary to become a GA. Zsinj^Talk 08:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]