Talk:Camp Paxson Boy Scout Camp
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Montana may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Camp Paxson Boy Scout Camp appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 June 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Cite template
[edit]One of the requirements in citation is that you have to have read the source that you are citing, so can I suggest that this ref:
- "Camp Paxson Has Experienced Ups, Down". The Missoulian. 1965. Retrieved May 27, 2012.
might actually be a cite web, if you only read the online source, not the original Missoulian newspaper article from 1965? If that is so, then perhaps something like:
- Chaffin, Mildred (1965). "Camp Paxson Has Experienced Ups, Down". My Forty Years Scribblin's. Retrieved May 27, 2012. - originally written in 1965 and published as a feature article in The Missoulian newspaper
might be a better citation (assuming I've followed the links correctly). --RexxS (talk) 18:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Doing now.PumpkinSky talk 22:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Former camp
[edit]From the article and links, this appears to be a former Scout camp, thus the Scout camp category is no longer appropriate. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 11:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know about scout camps, but a dead composer is still in cat:composers, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Do composers get repurposed after death? Paxson was a Scout camp from 1924 to 1942— that is 18 years, and it is now 64 years later. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's still a major scout connection. Where' it say the cat is only for active ones? Want to remove the ScoutingProject banner too?PumpkinSky talk 15:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not to mention it has Boy Scout in the NRHP title.PumpkinSky talk 15:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Was going to propose a new category, as there are at least two other former camps not in the category, but I am abandoning this line and taking the article off my watchlist. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 16:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not to mention it has Boy Scout in the NRHP title.PumpkinSky talk 15:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Composers do get repurposed after death, but I've never seen one moved into the category "decomposers". (Couldn't resist.) --RexxS (talk) 18:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- We can make a new cat if you want, probably the best solution.PumpkinSky talk 20:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's still a major scout connection. Where' it say the cat is only for active ones? Want to remove the ScoutingProject banner too?PumpkinSky talk 15:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Do composers get repurposed after death? Paxson was a Scout camp from 1924 to 1942— that is 18 years, and it is now 64 years later. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Montana articles
- Low-importance Montana articles
- WikiProject Montana articles
- Start-Class Scouting articles
- Low-importance Scouting articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Montana
- Wikipedia Did you know articles