Talk:Caltex Australia

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Caltex
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Caltex

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 17 October 2022. The result of the discussion was retarget.

Brands

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles

Australia

	Australia portal Caltex Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles

Requested move merge 14 May 2020

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Caltex Australia → Ampol

Ampol → Ampol (historic)

Caltex Australia & Ampol → Ampol

– Caltex Australia has been officially renamed Ampol after annual general meeting today (14 May 2020). Therefore, in current and future contexts, Ampol will refer to the currently-listed company, and hence the Caltex Australia page should be renamed Ampol. ~~The older Ampol will then be renamed to disambiguate from the new Ampol. This is similar to Transdev vs Transdev (historic).~~ Marcnut1996 (talk) 09:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we need two separate articles? Just merge them into Ampol Limited and have a section about the history...the Caltex merger...the sale from Chevron...the rename to Ampol Limited.

Simples. Alan Cramer (talk) 10:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nom: I have changed from a move request to a merge discussion. We will have to elect which edit history to retain. Marcnut1996 (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ampol article edit history should be retained. The Caltex Australia article, despite being more detailed, only split from the global Caltex article two months ago. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 14:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and rename i.e. merge Ampol and Caltex Australia articles and rename Ampol. Similar to BHP that merged with Billiton to become BHP Billiton and was later rebranded BHP. Perrykake (talk) 06:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with DilatoryRevolution in retaining the Ampol history. Just need to build in the sections from the Caltex article that are missing from the Ampol entry. Alan Cramer (talk) 08:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some significant headway into merging the article contents over to the Ampol page. Feel free to review it and make changes there. If everyone is satisfied, we will remove this article's contents and setup a merge redirect. If you wish to continue Talk discussions, I suggest they be made over there as well. Alan Cramer (talk) 00:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I have moved the discussion over to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ampol#Move_discussion_in_progress which is more appropriate for going forward. Comments welcome. Alan Cramer (talk) 00:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]