Talk:Calgary Stampede

Safety section

A stetement was made that the Calgary Stampede loses on average 10 horses a year along with the statement that "In 1986, 12 horses were killed during the Stampede" and "Since then, 25 horses have died as a direct result of this annual event." This would be 37 horses in 23 years which works out to be 1.6 horses per year, which contradicts the above claims. Also, point of order, annually since 1982 the Chuckwagon Races at the Calgary Stampede have involved 9 heats per night of 4 wagons per heat over 10 days. Each heat has 20 cowboys and 32 horses competing. In a single year that works out to be 90 races, 1800 human trips and 2880 horse trips around the Calgary Race track. Since 1986 that would be 2,070 races, 41,400 human trips and 66,240 horse trips. There have been 2 human deths in that time which works out to be 0.1% of the races resulted in a human death and 0.005% of the human trips resulted in a death. 19 horse deaths are listed as the result of the chuckwagon races since 1986. It doesn't say how many races were involved, but it works out to be 0.03% of the horse trips resulted in a death. Statistically speaking for the chuckwagon races only, these are all extremely small numbers and frequencies, so to offer a statement that claims that accidents in the chuckwagon races are extremly common is more of an opinion than a hard fact. For the most part, this section of the article was very good, but for a factual artice I think certain claims needed to be omitted. --Bullrider 21:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billymelville (talk • contribs)

I put in a section, that addresses the safety for animals and humans, of the rodeo. I wanted to do it for the overall Stampede, but only have information on the rodeo portion. There has been the odd fatality in the parade, but I have no sources. Ideally the "Rodeo Safety" sub-section could be expanded, and re-named. Perhaps it should deal with more than just listing off deaths over the years, since that doesn't give a great picture of overall safety. --rob 7 July 2005 04:17 (UTC)

I noticed my section of "safety" has been renamed and reworded, which is fine. Given the preference for "point form", for the incidients, it's worth noting the the CBC article I cited [1], actually gives a really good point-by-point list of what happened. I had removed the details, to make it sound better in paragraph form. If we're going to use point form, than we might as well take advantage of that, and just reproduce what's in the CBC article, to the greatest extent possible, allowed under copyright law. Rather than editing the list that's there, just start fresh from the CBC article. --rob 7 July 2005 08:26 (UTC)

Other note: The exact cause of the latest accident on the bridge, has not been determined. This article gives the train as the sole and known reason for spooking the horses. The organizers actually knew the train schedule in advance, so it was no surprise. Nobody is yet stating they know exactly why the horses were spooked. The train is just the obvious possibility, that was first reported. We might never know. --rob 7 July 2005 08:26 (UTC)

[Many horses are terrified of bridges. Some will flatly refuse to go onto one. A herd moving at speed, familiar with the sound of its hoof-beats on solid ground, suddenly finds itself on a bridge. There is a very different sound to the hoof-beats; the most easily spooked horses will panic; the panic will spread; the disastrous result will occur. The event organizers should have been aware of this potential, imo. Perhaps they were. Perhaps they opted for stampeding the herd over the bridge, hoping it would all be over before panic erupted. Alternatively, the outriders could have slowed the pace and spaced the herd out on the approach to the bridge. Dave Livingston, Ottawa.]

I have made changes to increase details about human deaths. I also, said the train "may have been" the cause of the horse spooking. We have to be careful about making libeleous claims of fact here. The train, it's schedule, and it's sounds, were all known in advance. To say that a known event/sound caused this, borders on accusing the organizers of negligence. Now, we can attribute that as an opinion of some, but that should not be stated as a known fact, until it is either admitted to, or proven with evidence. The mere fact of the train noise is not such evidence. --rob 8 July 2005 02:46 (UTC)

I think your edits are good. About the train business however: I was under the impression that a train WAS shunting cars at the time. However, you are right in saying that this was not a known CAUSE and that the reasons were likely manyfold. However, I don't think this points to negligence because no train actually passed. The locomotive was merely shunting cars which happens constantly in rail yards. I suppose that nobody thought that this would be a concern. --Tyson2k 8 July 2005 06:17 (UTC)

Fair point. That's why I said it only "borders" on negligence. Mainly, I just want to wait a bit, and leave open the possibility that the Stampede or SPCA will announce they found some other, more signficant cause, that nobody even thought off. So, far, I think the media reports are just based on the fact that everybody heard the train sound, and then saw/heard the horses go crazy, and assumed the two go together. Probably the case, but it's so easy to jump to the wrong conclusion. --rob 8 July 2005 16:58 (UTC)

To provide balance to the point-by-point listing of deaths, I thought I should put in a point-by-point list of postive historical developments of the Stampede. There's some repitition in the information. But, I think it gives clearer explanation of how things came to pass. Ideally, the "General Overview" should be edited to skip the numbers/dates and just give a broader explanation of development. --rob 07:46, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

TimeLine confusion

Here's a little bit of a possible contradiction I recently discovered:

• http://www.stampede.coolattractions.com/history.html - "1932 The Calgary Exhibition joined with the Stampede to become the Calgary Exhibition and Stampede "
• http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0012302 - "In 1923, the rodeo merged with the Calgary Industrial Exhibition", same article also says 1932 is the year when Weadick was fired (from the organization he founded).

This is a little confusing. Was the "The Calgary Exhibition" the same as "Calgary Industrial Exhibition". If different, did they both merge into the present organization. If so, both years are needed. Is the 1923 reference just a transposition error for 1932.? Was Weadick fired the same year the Stampede and Exhibition merged?

For now I'll stick with the CalgaryStampede.com source. The only reason I would like to use the other source, is it mentions Weadicks departure, which seems like a major event. However, if I doubt one year in the article, I have to doubt all of them. Weadicks departure does not seem to be discussed in many places. --rob 17:33, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Use of Exhibition disambiguation link

I'm cleaning up some disambiguation bits and bobs, and this page links to the exhibition page. I am not entirely convinced on the best true redirect, as I have (sadly) never been to Calgary during the stampede. For the moment I'll go with "fair" which does not seem to do it justice - please correct if wrong, and accept my apologies. State fair is another possibility, but the onward link seems very USA orientated, hence somehow wrong for an all Canadian event. LeeG 14:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Disambiguation to fair is appropriate. -- JamesTeterenko 14:40, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Great, thanks. I'll remove the link from the title to the disambiguation page too. Makes my life a bit easier! LeeG 14:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

change to intro paragraph

beforehand the ending of this paragraph suggested that only tourists dress in western attire. Also, I know for a fact, since i heard it from Max Foran during his class on the Stampede at U of C, that tourists only makeup a small percentage of visitors to the stampede, something like 20%. I can't find a source, however. Kilter 03:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Just exatcly where is the rodeo venue?

Are the rodeo events held in the Saddledome or in a temporary bleacher or something else? A curious Edmontonian. Kevlar67 21:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

There is a permanent outdoor arena on the Stampede Grounds that hosts rodeo action. It is within sight of the Saddledome to the southwest. Seats about 15,000, iirc. Resolute 07:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CStampedelogo.png

Image:CStampedelogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CStampedelogo.png

Image:CStampedelogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Big Four

Not knowing anything about Canadian history, and never having attended the Stampede, I was confused by the mention of the Big Four. It doesn't have its own Wikipedia page, (Big Four doesn't mention them) and the only explanation on the Burns page is the '"Big Four" western cattle kings who started the stampede'. The things I would like to see included here are: Who made up the term? And did it even apply to these men BEFORE they came together to finance the Stampede?

As for the rest of the article, only the controversy section is fleshed out, and then only the animal welfare controversies. (If Weadick was fired, for example, I imagine that it caused controversy). Everything in the lead paragraphs should be expanded upon in the main body of the article, as per the rest of Wikipedia. I plan to do some research myself, but surely Canadians have better access to sources than I do. Fleebo (talk) 05:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Western Showcase

I'm not quite clear why my addition of "Western Showcase" which is the Western Art Show directly associated with the Calgary Stampede, keeps being removed from the Events section of the page. It is an integral part of the overall 10 day event known as the Calgary Stampede, and takes place on Stampede Park under the auspices of the Calgary Stampede Association, yet I've been advised that '... one or more of the external links you added to the page Calgary Stampede do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project....'.

I can only guess that the problem might be that Western Showcase (like most areas of the Calgary Stampede) has its own stand-alone website outside of www.calgarystampede.com which is somehow being considered in some way an inappropriate advertisement of a non-Stampede event on the Stampede wikipedia page, which it is not.

Yycdjj (talk) 09:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Your latest addition I reverted as it is a direct copy off their webpage, and therefore is a copyright violation. If the prose is going to remain, you will need to rewrite it in your own words using reliable sources. The Western Showcase webpage itself is a good starting point for a source, but it would help if there was additional references unrelated to the Stampede's websites for further sourcing - i.e.: if there is newspaper coverage of the Showcase. I'd say to rewrite the section, and you should be ok with it. As far as the addition of the external link goes, I'd probably leave it off. The link will be added as one of your references, so will exist in the article without requiring a second mention. Hope this helps! Resolute 17:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

YYCDJJ, you need to read the research and tell us in your own words what it is about, so that we can read about your unique talented explanation. -Sammy cat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs) 23:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Barrel-Racing-Szmurlo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Barrel-Racing-Szmurlo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Use of Stampede or stampede?

Through the article, there are a number of uses of "the Stampede". I agree that Calgary Stampede should be capitalised as a proper name, but should it be "a stampede" or "the stampede", as I don't think that a stampede by itself is a proper name. Any thoughts? OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 17:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Well, "Stampede" is always capitalized in RSes when referring to the Calgary Stampede: [2], [3]. To my mind, it is something similar to the handling of a sports team's name. The Calgary Flames are still shortened to "Flames" rather than "flames". Resolute 19:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

i see your point, but this is not the only stampede, rather a stampede is a type of event. To me this looks like Kentucky Derby or Hickstead Derby which are both derby competitions as per the WP:MOS, or away from sport Oxford University or Yale University are both universities. Capitalised when they are part of the proper name, lower case without. The capitalisation like that in sources doesn't neceassarily mean we should do it here, but should follow our own MOS. I'm not sure that this is the same a sports team (where I think capitals do apply). Any more thoughts out there? OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 19:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Owain, the sports team analogy works here. The "derby" reference doesn't work for rodeos, as names like "roundup," "stampede,""Whoop-up days" "Frontier Days" or whatever don't distinguish different types, they are all just cutesy ways to not call every rodeo-with-extra-stuff just a "rodeo." Thus "THE Stampede" is capitalized because "A stampede" is simply when a bunch of animals run off. Hence here, "the rodeo" would be lower case, but "the Stampede" would be correct. (Also, pretty much every rodeo I know of that has "stampede" in its title --i.e. Last Chance Stampede, etc. -- began after Calgary, so borrowing inspiration from the fount...) Montanabw^(talk) 19:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Well, keep in mind that a stampede is not the same as the Stampede. In this case, it is being used as the proper name of the event. i.e.: in 2005, nine horses died in a stampede as they were being led to the Stampede. If you decapitalize the latter usage, that statement becomes nonsensical. Resolute 19:29, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Exactly my point, only said better! Montanabw^(talk) 21:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I still don't agree, i'm afraid - WP:MOSCAPS is pretty clear. As this is page about the event, any reference to "the stampede" will be automatically believed to be linked to the Calgary Stampede, so no sense is lost. For instance at Harvard University, a number of paragraphs and sentences start with "The university...", but no reader is left in doubt as to which university is meant in the article. I look at Montana's argument about more or less every rodeo having stampede in the title, but draw the opposite conclusion, in that it suggests to me that it has becoem a generic word in English corpus usage (regardless of whether it was the first or not) and as such, is just like 'university'. I'm tempted to RfC this with some MOSCAPS type people. OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 04:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I think we can resolve this without the time and effort of an RfC, which will drag every disgruntled editor on wiki into what currently is a generally amicable discussion. Perhaps some places we can replace "The Stampede" with "the rodeo" or something to avoid the problem altogether. I'll take a peek at that and see where it can be done without looking silly. (And I didn't say "every" rodeo is a "stampede!" (grin) just that it's one of a collection of terms like "roundup" and XYZ Days" that, unlike "Derby" (or derby) does not any particularly different type or class of rodeo.) My own thinking on the matter is influenced by, as an example, legal writing, when one is speaking of courts in general, it is lower case, but when one is addressing the court that has one's own case in front of it, one says, "this Court," or "the Court" -- a similar usage is almost always adhered to when speaking of the Supreme Court. Useful snippets from MOSCAPS:: Wikipedia:MOSCAPS#Institutions the institution is all caps, the term not. I can see Owain's argument there, but the section doesn't address the "The Institution" issue. Of help to my view, the general guideline: "Capital letters are sometimes a matter of regional differences. If possible, as with spelling, use rules appropriate to the cultural and linguistic context." Montanabw^(talk) 14:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect, no. "Stampede" in this case is a proper noun, and as such is capitalized. This fact is supported in common usage, and WP:MOSCAPS actually supports the current position (general principles). I do not see value in making pointless changes of "Stampede" to "the rodeo" or similar to appease one editor who dislikes this reality. Resolute 15:21, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Having been dealing with a totally useless RfC on whether we should measure horses in hands or not (see talk page of WPEQ for the lamest wikidrama ever, IMHO, at least since the fight over the pronunciation of "chaps":-P ) I am quite reluctant to do something that will drag in 10 completely uniformed people with an RfC, particularly on a capitalization issue, which has been wiki-drama central at times. Owain is generally a pretty good egg and normally prone to be a tendentious editor, so Owain, can we live with the distinction between "the Stampede" and "a stampede" per either my example of "the Court" or WPMOS example on use of "god" and "God"? I rephrased some of the references to "The Stampede," (which may have been a little excessive anyway) but I could not in good conscience eliminate them all, as at times the use of the term is perfectly relevant. Montanabw^(talk) 22:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I think you may have added "Calgary" a few too many times, but those are fair changes overall. I am going to reverse one change, which I believe made the statement less accurate, however: the movies were filmed at the Stampede. "On location" could be assumed to mean on the park, whether or not the Stampede itself was happening. Resolute 22:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

• Voted for capitalization, as Resolute said. "Stampede" is a proper noun it's the name of a event. -Samsamcat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Comments

I've done some copy-editing on the article, feel free to revert if I've unintentionally altered your meaning anywhere. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

• "Seeking to take advantage of the opportunity to promote itself, the city spent C$145,000 to build six new pavilions and a racetrack, held a lavish parade and rodeo, horse racing and trick roping competitions as part of the event" - phrasing. Are the competitions part of the rodeo, or are they separate?
• "One million people attended for the first time in 1976." - this can be read either as the one-million mark in attendance was first reached in 1976, or there were one million first-time attendees in 1976. Which is correct?
• "Aggie Days was introduced in 1989 as a means to introduce urban schoolchildren to agriculture and proved immediately popular." - cool, but what is this?
• "the BMO Centre" or "The BMO Centre"?
• First paragraph of Employment could use some rewording
• "The owner of that tent..." - which tent? Is this large tent associated with any particular bar or pub?
• Page number for the Dormer article?
• as a general point, make sure reference formatting is consistent throughout
• It's not entirely clear what you mean by "western themes"/"western values"
• File:Program_for_1912_Calgary_Stampede.jpg is tagged as lacking author information. Depending whether or not the author is known, you might consider a different copyright tag
• File:Guy-weadick-florence-ladue.jpg: who is the copyright holder?
• Personally I would put the Employment section earlier and the Stampede Park section later. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks for the quick re-review! I've addressed most. I was already a little concerned about the two images - there is zero doubt they are both public domain due to age, but I also am aware that image extremists might hold the lack of author info as a problem despite the fact both are 100 years old. Author information is most certainly not available for either. Also, for moving the sections, is there any particular reason? Resolute 01:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

• Well, saying the author is unknown would be considered better than the "lacking info" tag, even though there is effectively no difference :-). As for the section order: it's a personal preference, but the events section doesn't rely on the venue section and would seem to be of greater importance, and employment would seem more vital than the Young Canadians section. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

• I've changed the one image, a little unsure of the second (Weadick). And please change the sections as you think might work. I am interested to see how it looks. Resolute 23:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Neutrality

I am concerned about the bias shown by User:Resolute all their editing seems to be in a very promotional style and I am curious how closely connected to the articles subject they are. For example we have comments such as: "Quite simply, the Stampede is Calgary. It defines this city's identity and history and is one of Canada's largest and most important festivals, and a party perhaps without equal in this country."

And here they seem to be saying they are using the article like some sort of advert: "I have been slowly working on the article over a period of about two years, but with the centennial Stampede coming next year, I used this year's event to drive the final push in the hopes that it will be featured in time for next year's celebration."

This and much of their editing seem to demonstate they are unlikely to be able to edit this article in a truly neutral way.87.113.213.225 (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

So... your issues are with my description of the event in the FA nomination, and not the article itself? Naturally, my FA nomination explained why I felt it was an important topic, and yes, I do enjoy bringing articles with upcoming major milestones to FA with the intention of it appearing on the main page. This would actually be the third for me, after History of the Montreal Canadiens (centennial) and Terry Fox (30th anniversary of run). WP:TFAR actually encourages date-relevant nominations. I would make note that the article went to both WP:PR and WP:FAC, where several editors assessed the quality of the article, including for NPOV. Your complaints also come after I myself initiated a discussion at the relevant noticeboard for further input. In short, you have offered no evidence to support your claims on this article. Resolute 17:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Using the self description of the event in the lead also lends a rather advert like style. The editor also appears to be less than accurate when mentioning criticism. Lumping those mentioned in one section into the animal rights community when it was shown as a wide group including MPs etc. Similar when stating the royal couple "refused" when no response from them was actually shown. As indicated in a tag I am also concerned about the closely connected sources used particuarly in some of the earlier stuff.87.113.213.225 (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I also note no statement has been made regarding how closely connected to the subject the editor is.87.113.213.225 (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Probably because my only connection to the Stampede is to walk through Stampede Park on the way to the Scotiabank Saddledome to attend hockey games. Resolute 18:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Fixed another bit of less than accurate info in welfare section and checking for more.87.113.213.225 (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I saw that, and thank you for that updated info. I have reformated the reference to match the article style. Resolute 19:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

First off, any good or featured article is almost inevitably written by someone who cares about the topic, why else go to all the work? Certainly not for the big bucks! Second, this article clearly passed a massive peer review on its way to FA, and these concerns were not raised by neutral reviewers. I have been lurking here for quite some time, contributing some copyedits here and there. In fact, Resolute has been shown to be a very dedicated and responsible editor who listens very well to constructive criticism. I find the article tone to be perfectly reasonable, not at all biased, and far from an advertisement. Some of the statements that may sound hyperbolic to the outsider are, in fact, wholly justified; the Stampede is pretty much why Calgary is known world-wide (I'm not even a Canadian, by the way, let alone a Calgarian), I mean, few outside the equestrian crowd have ever heard of, say, Spruce Meadows, few could name what else Calgary is famous for, and who is their hockey team, anyway (?) (grin). It's sort of like chocolate and Hershey, Pennsylvania or the groundhog and Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania Finally, to up the material on the animal rights stuff is to put undue weight on the issue, as most of those complaints are brought about by people who oppose rodeos in general, and Calgary just get more than its share of protests due to its fame. Also, the rodeo itself is only one part of the overall experience that is the Stampede event, so going on and on about the issue doesn't make sense, any more than it would do to go on and on about the increased number of arrests for public drunkenness or inappropriate sexual activity. The main critiques that are unique to Calgary are thoroughly discussed and documented with reliable sources. To go much farther would then require more balance by pro-Stampede material, which would unnecessarily bulk out the article for no good reason. Montanabw^(talk) 21:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Images of Calgary Stampede 1982

Just saw that this is the featured article of the day. So I decided to upload my scanned slides from 1982 a bit earlier than I had planned. The quality is what you would expect for 30 year old 35mm slides. I don't know if any of the recognicable people are celebrities, or just "innocent" bystanders, but perhaps we have some experts here. --Rainer Halama (talk) 00:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you give us a link to the group? Montanabw^(talk) 03:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

It's right there→ to the right. 117Avenue (talk) 04:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Calgary Stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090717023107/http://www.cbc.ca:80/canada/calgary/story/2009/07/13/calgary-stampede-attendance.html? to http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/07/13/calgary-stampede-attendance.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110929110511/http://www.albertasportshalloffame.com/component/zoo/item/carbury-joe to http://www.albertasportshalloffame.com/component/zoo/item/carbury-joe
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110119071204/http://www.cbc.ca/news/pointofview/2010/07/calf-roping-at-the-calgary-stampede-should-it-be-banned.html to http://www.cbc.ca/news/pointofview/2010/07/calf-roping-at-the-calgary-stampede-should-it-be-banned.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101031053747/http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/calgary_stampede/ to http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/calgary_stampede/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120111150055/http://www.canadaeast.com/front/article/1141121 to http://www.canadaeast.com/front/article/1141121
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.cbc.ca/sports/calgarystampede/blog/2010/07/buckle-bunnies-whiskey-and-stampede-rumours.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110929110438/http://www.albertasportshalloffame.com/component/zoo/item/1948-calgary-stampeders-football to http://www.albertasportshalloffame.com/component/zoo/item/1948-calgary-stampeders-football

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Calgary Stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121110112909/http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/story.html?id=ce1fbe0d-d4ff-4f0d-b3ff-cec5311a633b to http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/story.html?id=ce1fbe0d-d4ff-4f0d-b3ff-cec5311a633b
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://cs.calgarystampede.com/stampede-social/broadcast.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.calgarystampede.com/stampede/broadcast

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Calgary Stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/07/13/calgary-stampede-attendance.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120201024623/http://news.calgarystampede.com/Theme/Calgary/files/doc_downloads/2009_media-guide_final_small.pdf to http://news.calgarystampede.com/Theme/Calgary/files/doc_downloads/2009_media-guide_final_small.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005064722/http://greycup.cfl.ca/article/the-story-of-the-1948-grey-cup_43629 to http://greycup.cfl.ca/article/the-story-of-the-1948-grey-cup_43629

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposing 3 images to be replaced lesser quality

Hello, I added three new pictures, which had superior quality and were more relevant to the subjects but my edits were reverted by @Montanabw: for whom I have a great respect. Thanks --Gnosis (talk) 05:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

First off, this is a featured article, so major changes need to be discussed first. Second, when someone is inserting photos they themselves took, they have a pretty high burden to demonstrate that they are clearly superior for the purpose intended. So the lead image you changed, at thumbnail size was tiny, mostly showing arena dirt and the bucking horse was partially blocked by the pickup riders; and the cheerleader photo was just mindless T&A. The showband photo had similar problems, the existing image showing a bit larger pattern and in daylight. While an image of higher resolution is nice when the content is also an improvement, merely having more pixels does not a better image make. Montanabw^(talk) 04:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Calgary Stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120509072039/http://test.calgarysun.com/news/Stampede/2010/07/09/14659826.html to http://test.calgarysun.com/news/Stampede/2010/07/09/14659826.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711150854/http://communities.canada.com/calgaryherald/blogs/stampede/archive/2009/07/04/stampede-an-event-of-numbers.aspx to http://communities.canada.com/calgaryherald/blogs/stampede/archive/2009/07/04/stampede-an-event-of-numbers.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Calgary Stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120902094047/http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=4c5dd667-6bf2-420a-a78d-50ef7db4cf0a to http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=4c5dd667-6bf2-420a-a78d-50ef7db4cf0a
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121110112328/http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/archives/story.html?id=ed77fced-1555-4793-b89b-a7aa1154a53e to http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/archives/story.html?id=ed77fced-1555-4793-b89b-a7aa1154a53e
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716125830/http://www.stampedequeensalumni.com/Default.aspx?cid=17&lang=1 to http://www.stampedequeensalumni.com/Default.aspx?cid=17&lang=1
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=3c87eaf6-685e-470b-b02e-28b9dd50342e
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905142148/http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/city/story.html?id=af58ed27-dae1-44d5-be1e-b7560df5878e to http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/city/story.html?id=af58ed27-dae1-44d5-be1e-b7560df5878e
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121110112916/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=1738deb8-9e62-4095-bb73-ad2548506f1e&k=43157 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=1738deb8-9e62-4095-bb73-ad2548506f1e&k=43157
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905143024/http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=00227e33-899b-4ce8-8245-9eb5bccf27c3 to http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=00227e33-899b-4ce8-8245-9eb5bccf27c3
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/city/story.html?id=3e3f954c-1270-48a7-8b2f-b0f8d4913351&p=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160324105046/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=769f6b8d-2ed6-4b17-a67f-f33ef3df54c4 to http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=769f6b8d-2ed6-4b17-a67f-f33ef3df54c4
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=5fa24d00-8981-4c0e-ba4a-572bcc835ace&p=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Calgary Stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107212210/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/indepth/2011-05/22/c_13887973.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/indepth/2011-05/22/c_13887973.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Calgary Stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110813230356/http://www.calgarysun.com/2011/07/09/tourism-officials-tally-royal-boost to http://www.calgarysun.com/2011/07/09/tourism-officials-tally-royal-boost
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120601171604/http://www.calgarysun.com/comment/editorial/2009/06/30/9977571-sun.html to http://www.calgarysun.com/comment/editorial/2009/06/30/9977571-sun.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120601172242/http://www.calgarysun.com/2011/07/11/stampede-gets-foreign-tourism-boost to http://www.calgarysun.com/2011/07/11/stampede-gets-foreign-tourism-boost

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Sex abuse

I have added back the Phil news. I can't see why it wouldn't/shouldn't be included. TVGarfield (talk) 06:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Because it is irrelevant to the subject of this article, for one. Resolute 00:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

I concur. This information does not belong in this article. By the way, this is a Featured Article, and all edits should be posted to the talk page first and discussed.dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Ignore my last edit summary...it was a typo. It should say I do not believe the bit belongs in this article...dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Flag of Calgary, Alberta.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)