Talk:Cajeput tree
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Clarify
[edit]Is this article about the trees, or the oils, or aromatherapy? Held in high regard in the east of what? Asia? US? their native range? If there are several species then why does the article refer to "the tree" and list features such as white flowers and lareg sizes that are not common to all the species listed?
The article needs a good cleanup and some references.
I added a couple references and modified the 'highly regarded in the East' line. It's still a stub article. Jen1735 (talk) 18:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Jen1735
"Cajeput trees grown in Australia are well known for having powerful therapeutic properties. Compared to other countries, Australia's cajeput contains high amounts of anti-infectious properties (cineol, pinene and others), and is a favorite among health professionals." - These statements are unsupported by any citations or, frankly, any scientific evidence of validity. This sounds like something written by a credulous person or an advocate for the supplement industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warreni1972 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)