Jump to content

Talk:Cadet Honor Code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cadet Honor Code. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

[edit]

Recent changes were made by IP 117.82.228.51 seeking to put the Citadel Cadet Honor Code in a different category. The reasons given were that the Citadel also has an honor code for non-cadets. However, the source material, while it is related to the topic, did not actually state the things that the IP editor has added to the article. I've reverted those changes, for now, pending further discussion. Ewen Douglas (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for opportunity to discuss further. I replaced accurate source info in the article as it clearly sheds light on fact that citadel, like norwich and texas A&M, has both a cadet and non-cadet honor code. Something which was repeatedly deleted and called into question, but which is now shown to be fact. Due to this, it should not be in same category as schools which have 100% cadets, such as WestPoint, VMI, Air Force Academy, and even Annapolis (which has honor concept, not code). Citadel with cadet corps and non-cadets corps is in line with Texas A&M, Norwich, and others. NOTE: Previous edits also claimed citadel has single-sanction honor code, similar to VMI, which is false (as covered near end of source in 'punishments section'). Punishments for honor violation at the citadel vary based on severity: dismissal, suspension, reprimand, or even fines, as listed on the school website. Thanks again for opportunity to shed light on this. Source website included for further review: http://www.citadel.edu/root/graduatecollege-current-students/honor-the-code

117.82.228.51 (talk) 11:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First off, you should know about WP:CYCLE. Wikipedia policy is to make an edit, and if it is reverted, to discuss that edit BEFORE making the edit again. To do otherwise is called edit warring, and you can be blocked from editing. I understand that you may not have been aware of this. I would encourage you to self-revert your last changes, as failure to do so would be called edit warring. After that, we can proceed with a civil discussion of the problems with your edits. Ewen Douglas (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I’m new here, so please forgive me if I’m off base. From what I’m seeing, it appears as though user: Ewen Douglas reverted edits and deleted references. Is that ok to do without previous discussion? Article in its current form is inaccurately written if reference is current and correct. Please advise...Slaphappy19 (talk) 09:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You appear to be the same editor as Strgzr1, who was blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and 117.82.228.51, who was blocked by @Black Kite: for block evasion. You are editing the same article, attempting to add the same unsourced content, and appear to be extremely familiar with Wikipedia policy for someone who just created an account today. Much like Strgzr1, one of your very first edits was to add a generic line to your user page and then to your talk page. Are you the same editor? Ewen Douglas (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that we’ve adequately cleared the air on your previous concerns, and hopefully we can now move forward positively. That said, can we now discuss the reference you deleted here? The reference clearly demonstrates 2 points: 1. There is no single-sanction punishment and 2. All students, both non-cadets and cadets at citadel adhere to their honor codeSlaphappy19 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The subject matter you're attempting to edit, your actual edits, your user and talk page elements, and even your manner of writing on other editors' talk pages are identical to Strgzr1 and 117.82.228.51; both blocked editors. Your claim that you are not the same person stretches credulity, to say the least. If you're truly interested in improving Wikipedia, a good start would be to come clean about your multiple accounts first. Ewen Douglas (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
At this point it’s best we bring someone else into this conversation. As I’ve already stated, your accusations are incorrect. Sorry to let you down and end to your witch hunt here, but it’s the truth. I’m not a sock-puppet, just trying to include all references, when applicable, and this reference clearly is applicable here: http://www.citadel.edu/root/graduatecollege-current-students/honor-the-code Is it possible to respectfully ask for some editor assistance (from someone other than Ewen Douglas) here?Slaphappy19 (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note, Slaphappy19 has been blocked for sockpuppetry. I'd ask anyone else watching this article to look at future edits attempting to add the same POV to check on whether it's yet another sockpuppet of the same person, as he's tried these edits multiple times under multiple accounts. I see no evidence that he intends to stop. Ewen Douglas (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone explain why accurate, factual, and properly referenced material is being arbitrarily removed by the same users here in this article? West point, Air Force Academy, VMI are all-cadet military academies/colleges with honor codes that apply to the CADETS who attend as students. Since their honor code applies to both cadets and non-cadets, The Citadel does not belong in this category (as referenced by its own website). Citadel (along with Norwich University and Texas A&M) have honor codes that apply to cadets and non-cadets. What is so difficult to understand here?Bogrum (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cadet_Honor_Code&oldid=1206505054"