Jump to content

User talk:117.82.228.51

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Military Classic of the South

[edit]

A discussion has been opened at the talk page of Military Classic of the South regarding your recent edits. PLEASE respect WP:CYCLE and do not re-revert without first discussing the problems with your changes. Thank you. Ewen Douglas (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will say the same thing to you, Ewen Douglas. You know the citadel has cadets and non-cadets playing on the athletic teams and you (along with other supporters of the school) try to cover it up. Pathetic to see the likes of you and some biased editors deleting sources and factual data. This is what hurts wikipedia's legitimacy. https://www.postandcourier.com/sports/vmi-and-the-citadel-the-same-but-different/article_b08c393c-18b0-5333-9ac4-82a6b58575ee.html Same holds true with Cadet Honor Code. You are blindly deleting and ignoring the following: http://www.citadel.edu/root/graduatecollege-current-students/honor-the-code In the future, Ewen and other biased editors, please respect sources and read them before blindly deleting and replacing with your biased opinions. And blocking people for posting relevant, timely, and factual references. Poor form. You guys can suck a bowl of wangs!117.82.228.51 (talk) 08:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User Strgzr1's edits and yours

[edit]

I have noticed that your edits are very similar to those added recently by a user named Strgzr1. That user was blocked by admins for "Abusing multiple accounts". By any chance, are you the same user as that one? Ewen Douglas (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting but no, not same user. Facts are facts, no matter who the user or editor may be. I am seeking to elevate this matter. You guys are blocking facts and allowing half-truths on wikipedia.117.82.228.51 (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No matter what is said, Ewen Douglas, you're going to delete any posts contrary to your own, no matter what resources and references are presented. Please refer to above and feel free to suck a bowl of wang!117.82.228.51 (talk) 08:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

117.82.228.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If truth and accuracy is paramount to wikipedia, can someone please let me know why I've been blocked (and so have several other previous users) for posting factual info about non-cadets at the citadel using the following sources? Seems like some 'shady' stuff is going on here with a select few editors... Also, source data I've posted and posted by other users has repeatedly been deleted, please check history. A response from a moderator (someone who hasn't previously deleted facts here) would be appreciated... Fact: Citadel has cadets and non-cadets playing on sports teams. Citadel does NOT have a single sanction honor code and both cadets and non-cadets abide by their code, as do Texas A&M and Norwich students. Please see sources which have been repeatedly deleted: (Many other sources are also available. Will the editors delete those as well?) https://www.postandcourier.com/sports/vmi-and-the-citadel-the-same-but-different/article_b08c393c-18b0-5333-9ac4-82a6b58575ee.html http://www.citadel.edu/root/graduatecollege-current-students/honor-the-code : 117.82.228.51 (talk) 04:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲水 08:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You suck, big time. Blocking users for posting relevant articles and posting facts goes against everything this site is 'supposed to stand for.' Two references blindly ignored and deleted repeatedly by Ewen Douglas and you do nothing: https://www.postandcourier.com/sports/vmi-and-the-citadel-the-same-but-different/article_b08c393c-18b0-5333-9ac4-82a6b58575ee.html http://www.citadel.edu/root/graduatecollege-current-students/honor-the-code This Ewen Douglas ass-hat deletes posts and yet I'm blocked for made up nonsense... really? Seriously, you guys can suck a bowl of schlongs, I'm outta here!117.82.228.51 (talk) 08:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Where is this "bowl" you speak of? Ewen Douglas (talk) 23:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:117.82.228.51&oldid=1050916231"