Jump to content

Talk:Cad Bane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

He is notable enough to have an article.--Abce2 (talk) 00:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's some pretty circular logic. Try again. --EEMIV (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. He is soon going to be the main villain in the second season of Star Wars, The Clone Wars on Cartoon Network.--Abce2 (talk) 01:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He is a major character, but I don't know how to do all the stuff that needs doing. --Abce2 (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

No need to delete if it can simply be rolled back to the non-copyvio redirect that existed on April 25, 2009. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns are justified. Striking language seems to have been appropriated throughout. Compare, for example, the following from our article:

He would then be reimagined as a human character, and his more outlandish alien features would redesigned, but this exploration was short-lived...

With the source:

Durge was reimagined as a human character, and his more outlandish alien features were redesigned, but this exploration was short-lived.

Revision here is very thin. The article has already been redirected; it might also be restored to earlier prose versions if these are written in our creator's own words and do not appropriate somebody else's. If the source can be verified to have been licensed compatibly for our reuse, this content can be retained, provided proper attribution is given. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt that it was justified. The paraphrasings are supposedly fixed now. − Jhenderson 777 02:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

references for future use.

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Cad Bane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]