Jump to content

Talk:Crotram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:CROTRAM)

(untitled)

[edit]

It would be very nice not to change parts of text so quickly, withot any knowledge on subject!

For instance, Duro Dakovic ( cro. Đuro Đaković) is real part of "Crotram" consortium, since it has very long tradition in building and production of trams.

But, also it was first factory at south-east Europe (including Slovenia and Greece) with capability of production trams, trains, wagons, tractors, process equipment, tanks, heavy machinery, nuclear reactors, sophisticated bridges etc.

Today, aldough it was plagued by war and transition, it is recovered and produce large scale of sophisticated products that are exported in EU countries.

For instance, it is one of only few firms in the whole world capable to build high-tech, and the most complex steal bridges. Also Duro Daković is producing the most sophisticated military machinery and vehicles, car parts, producing wagons and special vehicles (eg. robotic mine-finder), building and reconstructing factories, producing agricultural vehicles, producing hot boilers and equipment for thermo plants etc...

Duro Dakovic (Đuro Đaković) is also very known and recognized in many EU countries for it's high quality ISO,ASTM,SGS and other standards, and very high skilled personell, which it's long tradition, since there is Faculty of Mechanical engineering in Slavonski Brod- home town of firm.

Some international partners of firm: Siemens, Krupp, Babcock, Voith, Sulzer, Fiat, Škoda, ...

Đuro Đaković from Slavonski Brod.

Firm Duro Dakovic is not part of "Crotram" consortium. At the start they were supposed to build the boogies, but from some reason they could not do their part of the job, so they left the consortium. The production of boogies was given to german firm Sames.


Đuro Đaković is still in that consortium, only that it'll start with it's part of production as soon as posible...

New Technologies

[edit]

" it has bottom axles, which is applied for the first time in the world" I don't know that it really is a first. Doesn't the 100% low floor version of the Citadis also have them?Myrtone (the strict Australian wikipedian)


Bogie development and production was given to german company SAMES, not Henschel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.148.217.236 (talk) 07:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HEY! Are you illiterate? I gave a clear reference, a link where you can find a lot of info about bogie mechanics on Henschel pages, and you say that's not true? And WHY are big Henschel logos on bogies than if they don't have anything to do with it? Give some proof if you want to dispute the facts, and you CAN'T to that by deleting other people's valid references!!!!!!!!!! Sames does its work, but also does Henschel, add substantial info if you can, but don't delete indisputable links. (By the way, SAMES official pages also metion Henschel's part in the project!)

Wikipedia is not for commercials

[edit]

This text with a lot of superfluous comments to praise the product is an advertisement for this tram disguised as an encyclopedial article. An article about this tram is ok, but it should be entirely rewritten. Otto ter Haar 13:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this text is ridiculous... I hope someone will change it soon.

Merge with ZET 2200

[edit]

Discuss here.Myrtone (the strict Australian wikipedian)

Merged, and tried to remove some of the adspeak. Orchid Righteous 08:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CROTRAM vs. TMK 2200

[edit]

What is this article really about: the consortium or the streetcar model? Admiral Norton (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment it does seem to be about both, which is rather odd. A major question is, have CROTRAM produced any other tram models in addition to the TMK 2200? If TMK 2200 is their only product, having both the manufacturer and the tram type in the same article would be fairly logical—although in that case I'd personally find it more logical and intuitive to retitle the page as TMK 2200. But that might be just me. -- Kjet (talk · contribs) 05:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CROTRAM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on CROTRAM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 September 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Due to lack of input following a relist and a MOS-based rationale having been presented I'm content with treating this as a technical request. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 12:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


CROTRAM → Crotram – Decapitalize per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Tewingspeat (talk) 06:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 19:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crotram&oldid=1201250043"