Talk:CJ Carella's WitchCraft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relevant reference for future consideration

Interview with CJ Carella --Craw-daddy | T | 16:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MyrmidonWitchCraft.jpg

Image:MyrmidonWitchCraft.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure). SSTflyer 01:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CJ Carella's WitchCraft → WitchCraft – no need for the first part, as seen in File:MyrmidonWitchCraft.jpg it went without that just fine, and the page is free Ranze (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC) relisted —SST flyer 03:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, too close to the primary Witchcraft, which is where Witch Craft (automatically, and should be directly) and Witch redirect. The page/name is only free because it already redirects, per spelling, to the primary. And if a page were separated into the capital in the middle, Witch Craft Works would have consideration. Moving this may be toil and trouble. Randy Kryn 11:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, too close to Witchcraft In ictu oculi (talk) 17:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.