Talk:CJK Compatibility

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Unicode block which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:18, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

㌀

Why were abbreviations such as ㌀ added? What criteria were followed? --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They date back to Unicode 1.0.0, and were added for compatibility with existing/legacy character sets which included such things. For Unicode 1.0, compatibility with existing characters sets was fundamental for getting Unicode accepted, and so many compatibility characters which were not strictly needed were encoded. BabelStone (talk) 17:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding links

Can I add [[ ]] to each character? Gioguch (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linking Unicode compatibility characters

This page and Unicode compatibility characters should be linked to each other with suitable commentary on the relation between the two. --Macrakis (talk) 13:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]