Talk:CGG (company)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Compagnie Générale de Géophysique was copied or moved into CGG (company). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merge from Compagnie Générale de Géophysique

I propose merging the page Compagnie Générale de Géophysique into this one. Please see my reasoning there. Kwinkunks (talk) 17:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Self-advertising

This article is mostly a puff about how wonderful they are, and heavily edited by CGG itself. CGG is not a RS for other than straightforward factual detail (when formed, name of chairman, turnover figures and the like). Davidships (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues

This is an unsourced 2007 article. Aside from the COI tag there are concerns of OR. Otr500 (talk) 15:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The section about Veritas DGC does not show that it is connected in any way to the subject of the article. There is no mention of Veritas DGC having been spun off from, or later merged into, CGG. Claude (talk) 05:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]