This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
When and if,the CANT 21 article gets written,I suggest thatthe two be merged under CANT 21 asthe proposed CANT 38was going to be VERYsimilarto the CANT 21,which was actually built!! On top of that theONLY known reference out side the CANT book, (which I have no access to), is now a dead link--Petebutt (talk) 06:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
