Talk:Bulleit Bourbon/Archives/2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Bulleit Bourbon. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
{{hangon}}
"Bulleit Bourbon" has 20,800 Google hits, shouldn't that suffice? Also, how is it advertising, it's not bragging about the product and the only link is to the official site? EditorInTheRye 02:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
U.K.
Hmm, here in the U.K. the 70cl bottles of Bulleit are only 40% ABV. Should that be included in the article? ArdClose (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- I just checked, and the same thing is true in Sweden, maybe it's a European thing? EditorInTheRye (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Pronunciation
What is the correct pronunciation for Bulleit? Should that be included in the article?↔NMajdan•talk 19:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Correction request
 | It is requested that an edit be made to this article that the user below does not want to make because of a conflict of interest. Please review the request below and make the edit if the edit is well cited, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. To the user using this template: please explain your conflict of interest in detail below. Please replace the {{Request edit}} template with {{tld|Request edit}} when the request is handled. |
I'm Rich Gallagher, and I work on Bulleit Bourbon's PR team. I'd like to contribute information that will improve the factual accuracy of this page.
I am aware of (and agree with) Wikipedia's policy regarding Conflict of Interest editing, so I'm not making changes to the page. However, I'd like to ask a Wikipedian to correct the line about Bulleit's rye content. The recipe is 28% rye, as you can see here.
I can also offer details about the company, Tom and Augustus Bulleit, and the history of the brand, if anyone would like to extend this entry beyond a stub. Please leave a message on my talk page or email rgallagher AT taylorpr DOT com.
RGTPR (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
History
The way this section is written, the reader is asked to accept the history of the brand without reference or citation... other than the unreferenced statement by the current marketer of the brand. In other words, there is no independent reference for the history of the brand. This would qualify as journalistic "thin ice."
In point of fact, the article is thinly sourced in its entirity. 842U (talk) 12:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)