Talk:Bulgaria in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National final inclusion

Stop vandalizing this page you moron! Who gives you the right to decide what a page can contain?

I am just making sure it is consistant with all of the other pages about the countries. This page isn't about the national final and it doesnt need 5 pictures that arent related to the topic. If you want to talk about who came in first, second, and third, then I suggest you click here Pesen Na Evrovizija 2007 and write an article about the competition. This page is only related to the participation of Bulgaria at Eurovision, not that Karizma came in second place and everything else. The song information you constantly post here can be already found on another page called Voda. Evilperson 20 15:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I just want to clarify that you are the one vandalizing this page. The photo you uploaded will be kept as it is the official promotional photo distributed by the EBU. Evilperson 20 15:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since when adding additional information and picture material tottaly relevant to the artcle and trying to make it look better is 'vandalism'? It seem like you really love to make other people miserable...I'll leave to enjoy your 'work'...

The text in Pesen Na Evrovizija 2007 is an almost exact duplication of the text in this article, so I don't see why it should exist. Disagreement between 3 (2?) editors on what it should contain is not a good reason. Preslav 17:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is focused mainly on the participation of Bulgaria at the Eurovision Song Contest 2007 and not the national final. The article Pesen Na Evrovizija 2007 needs a complete rewrite as it duplicates the information found on this page. That information does not focus on the national final. The other editor here does not understand this and a conflict now exists. Evilperson 20 00:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why this article should focus on BG's participation in ESC 2007 and not contain information on all the stages of selection of Bulgaria's ESC entry? Is there a Wikipedia or ESC Project policy on this that I'm not aware of? Is this article getting so long that information on the selection procedure should be split off into its own article? Preslav 07:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article focuses on Bulgaria's participation at Eurovision and not on the individual national selection. The information from the national selection has already been covered in this article and also the final scoreboard is also present. The article on Pesen Na Evrovizija should go more in depth on the semi-final and others news surrounding the event rather than copying the information from this article. If you view the other pages of the other countries, you will see that this format is carried through. Example, Norway in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007 and Melodi Grand Prix 2007. Evilperson 20 21:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Evilperson, Preslav is right. This page is about every aspect of Bulgaria's participation, including the song selection. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]