Talk:Bukit Kutu
Appearance
Bukit Kutu has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bukit Kutu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bukit Kutu/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Guettarda (talk · contribs) 14:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
This looks interesting. I'll review it. Guettarda (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- After the first "kilometres" you can abbreviate them to "km". I recommend adding the parameter
|abbr=on
in the {{convert}}. If you don't, you should use|adj=on
in places like the second sentence get15.3-kilometre (9.5 mi) bridle path
instead of the grammatically incorrect15.3 kilometres (9.5 mi) bridle path
- Third sentence:
and the British government acquired the station's bungalows
. Was it actually the British government, or perhaps the government of the Federated Malay States? If you aren't sure (the source just says "the government", unless I missed something more specific), I think "the government of British Malaya would probably work. But I'm pretty sure the government of the United Kingdom (which is where that link leads) did not acquire the hill station.
- I am not entirely sure which "government" in the reference refers to, In sentence, at the moment replaced with "government of British Malaya". WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
History
[edit]- You say
Because of safety precautions...
andDespite the trail's dangers...
, but you don't say what the safety precautions or the dangers are. The first one could beAs a safety precaution...
but if you start with "because of" or "despite" the implication is that you are referencing something that came before.
- Done rewritten as due to risks of lost inside the trail. WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
In July 2017, another hiker from Egypt...
- unless there was a previous hiker from Egypt, you should just say something like "a hike from Egypt", or "another hiker, this one from Egypt". And if there was a previous hiker from Egypt, you should mention them before the "another".
- Done There is only one hiker from Egypt with this incident. WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Biodiversity
[edit]For instance, seven variants of mosquitoes
- do you mean variants, or do you mean species or subspecies? "Variant" usually implies something less than a subspecies.
- Done replaced to "subspecies". WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Guettarda (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
@Guettarda: I had done improve the article based on your suggestion. Can have a check on the article before finalize for the GA. WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good! Nice work. Guettarda (talk) 12:59, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Geography and places good articles
- GA-Class geography articles
- Low-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles
- GA-Class Malaysia articles
- Low-importance Malaysia articles
- WikiProject Malaysia articles
- GA-Class Southeast Asia articles
- Low-importance Southeast Asia articles
- WikiProject Southeast Asia articles
- GA-Class Ghost town articles
- Low-importance Ghost town articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors