Talk:Buffalo Ridge
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
A fact from Buffalo Ridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Stratigraphy / Geology
[edit]From what I know, this is a relatively undeformed area, with sedimentary rocks piling up in stratigraphic order. Therefore, cretaceous rocks could not be below the Precambrian Sioux Quartzite. I'm going to change it with a reference. Awickert (talk) 02:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Made the change. Awickert (talk) 02:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Wind Farm
[edit]I'd like to see this section more focused and to the point. The wind farms are part of Buffalo Ridge but they are not Buffalo Ridge. If there's a need for encyclopedic information on the wind farms themselves, at some point that should be broken into it's own article.Prk166 (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- There is a wind farm called Buffalo Ridge Wind Farm - this should have a separate page. In addition to this one there are numerous (at least 20) others that have been constructed on Buffalo Ridge. Yes this section needs to be redone.--71.214.237.152 (talk) 02:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Buffalo Ridge Wind Farm now has its own article. --Aflafla1 (talk) 04:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Draninge to east side of ridge is incorrect
[edit]East drainage of Northern part of Couteau des Prairies does flow into Minnesota, but for the Buffalo Ridge portion(southern counties), it drains into the Des Moines River (West Fork). --71.38.175.146 (talk) 21:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Headwaters of the Redwood River (Minnesota River basin) lie mostly in Pipestone & Lincoln counties. JC Shepard (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm seeing now that the WDM River drainage lies a little further east of most of it. Could we say that the area is mostly to the Big Sioux and Minnesota, with some southeast portions draining into the West Des Moines River? --71.38.171.114 (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Buffalo Ridge/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The article states that Buffalo Ridge is the highest point on the Coteau at 1995 feet. However, there is a point near Summit, SD, also on the Coteau, at over 2040 feet, and Summit, South Dakota's article claims a 2014 ft elevation for the town..
Reference: http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?T=2&S=12&Z=14&X=816&Y=6272&W=3&qs=%7csummit%7csd%7c , see top center of image Ptschett 03:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 03:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Buffalo Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060929083936/http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/habitat/rlandscp/s2-2-1.htm to http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/habitat/rlandscp/s2-2-1.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070416072730/http://hendricksmn.com:80/wind_towers.html to http://www.hendricksmn.com/wind_towers.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060929083936/http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/habitat/rlandscp/s2-2-1.htm to http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/habitat/rlandscp/s2-2-1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Buffalo Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724044059/http://www.wgtn.net/historical/1882/nobles_map.htm to http://www.wgtn.net/historical/1882/nobles_map.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://hendricksmn.com/wind_towers.html%3E
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/habitat/rlandscp/s2-2-1.htm%3E
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)