Talk:Bubbles (video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Prose is a little choppy in some sections.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Alright, after reviewing this article it's pretty solid and informative, but there's one thing holding me up on it: the prose. The way some sentences are feels too choppy, especially in the lead and even development and reception sections, making the article somewhat difficult to wade through. A light copyedit will probably solve the issue, it just needs it to flow better. Other than that no complaints about the article: it's another informative piece by you, which is always a good read.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I gave it a copy edit sweep, but admittedly I didn't change much. If that didn't address your concern, I can try to get some one else to give it a look. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC))

Alright we look good to go, passing now.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)