This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Taddeo Alderotti, like Hermann el Alemán in Toledo, translated to Latin Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Brunetto Latini was indeed the first to translate it to romance language. In French, and then in Tuscan.--83.34.91.3814:03, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Galassi, I'm not sure if you've ever read Dante. But the sodomites are the ones running around on the hot sand. Look at the picture Galassi - they are running. See? Running. And there is Brunetto chatting to Dante and Virgil. The blasphemers are prostrate. Try and relax a bit about homosexuality. Contaldo80 (talk) 15:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I consider this return as the return of the original research, as it first don't looks very neutral, secondly, it tries polymize with article content putting forward one of the points of view of a speculative question as a categorical truth. If this opinion is properly reflected in an authoritative source, then we must rewrite this phrase or section, since at the moment it doesn't look like a neutral presentation, but an open attempt to convince the reader of a certain position. Solaire the knight (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Contaldo80, so, could you really voice your objections? I created this topic following your proposal back in 2019, but despite the call to discuss and seek consensus, over these 5 years you have not participated in the discussion (in addition to an even older discussion from 2016 where you suggest citing image ratings as a source for Dante's intentions). So I would like to finally hear the reasons for your objection. Solaire the knight (talk) 16:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
