Jump to content

Talk:Brown Derby (liquor company)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 18 May 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 15:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Brown Derby (company)Brown Derby (liquor company)WP:PRECISE the restaurants are also a company so "(company)" is ambiguous disambiguation, so not useful in identifying the topic. The current title should point to Brown Derby that also being a business. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 07:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 06:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:

In my mind "liquor company" does not sound like a retail store chain. However, I am unsure how to title the disambiguator. Conversely, Brown Derby as it is currently written is mostly about a defunct company, and is more notable for its historical relevance than its relevance as a business. The Ohio Brown Derby seems like it is tacked on to the end because it shares a name. EricSerge (talk) 02:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brown Derby (liquor company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]