Talk:British and Foreign Bible Society

Christianity High‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible High‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I don't know much about the origins of the BFBS or Alfred Sturge, but it seems a little incongruent that he should be regarded as one of its founders, since he was born more than a decade after the organzation was started. The sentence on his involvement should probably be editted accordingly. Best wishes--

removal of content

Removing content from this article should have some reasoning behind it. Can the controversial section be broken down or separated outBrian0324 23:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)?[reply]

It's just vandlism, this person seems to have a few pages he/she is determined to change for no real reason Ram4eva 22:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Principles of translations?

Does this society use any expressed translation principles or sources? ... said: Rursus (bork²) 11:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

"Does anyone else feel that this page currently reads like an advert or promotional material from the concerned party? --Riche (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)"[reply]

Yes, but that's hardly an argument against it. Every other page on Wikipedia reads like either an advert or a personal attack.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on British and Foreign Bible Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]