Talk:British Hong Kong Garrison

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: British / European Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,054)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,479) • Stub-Class articles (6,682)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (387) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,339)

Text and/or other creative content from this version of British Forces Overseas Hong Kong was copied or moved into British Hong Kong Garrison with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Page rename

Should this be renamed to Hong Kong Garrison (before 1997) or Hong Kong Garrison (British and Commonwealth forces) to properly reflect its scope? 218.255.11.66 (talk) 15:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Article titles, can you explain your reasoning a bit more? Ping Zanhe, who unfortunately doesn't look like they're active right now, but they were the editor who moved it to the current title four years ago. And thank you for starting a discussion with reasoning ahead of making a major change. —valereee (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, to properly reflect its scope. (Not just British apparently isn't it? Or do I have to explain what the Commonwealth (of Nations) is?) 218.255.11.66 (talk) 11:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ← What do you mean? I have no idea what you are referring to. 218.255.11.66 (talk) 11:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Split section, somewhat boldly given the discussion above; moving the section, rather than creating another small unreferenced article, seems like a better idea. Klbrain (talk) 09:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]