Talk:Breda Ba.65

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / Italian / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Alleged Russian use of Ba.65

"However this reference can only be found online and is never mentioned in "#7 Ali D'Italia Breda Ba 65". It can only be assumed that the pictures of Chile's aircraft (with a blue star on the tail) in Back & White look Russian."

This assumption has no place in the article. Should it be moved to the talk page until final confirmation is located? Asd36f (talk) 02:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ba.65

Here http://www.comandosupremo.com/war-in-the-mediterranean-part-3-italian-plane-bad-plane.html an article on this airplane Ipvariabile (talk) 14:40, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting information about the number of units build

Since the Plane Encyclopedia tells the exact number of units built was 215 and I see no referenced data about the 155 units the Wiki claims, should I change that?--Escorxador (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't claim 155 were built - it states 218! And what is "The Plane Encyclopedia"?Nigel Ish (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well my mistake but the Plane Encyclopedia is one of the references of the article which claims 218 were ever built. Thanks for the answer.--Escorxador (talk) 18:40, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]